Clash of the titans: investors and managers at odds over alternatives regulation

A battle has broken out between investors and suppliers over the regulation of hedge fund and private equity managers, with opposing testimony given to the US Senate by the country’s largest pension fund, the $180.9 billion CalPERS, and a US-based venture capital firm. In this “Have Your Say” column we ask you whether you agree with CalPERS that all hedge fund managers raising capital in the US should be forced to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or whether you think the current regulations are sufficient.

Testifying to the US Senate banking subcommittee on securities, insurance and investment recently on regulating
hedge funds and other private investment pools, Joe Dear, chief investment officer of CalPERS recommended that all investment managers raising funds in the US be forced to register with the SEC and be subject to its oversight.

However Trevor Loy, founder and general partner of Flywheel Ventures, a venture capital firm based in New Mexico, argued in his testimony that venture capital should be exempt from the requirement to register with the SEC under
the Investment Advisers Act and that additional SEC registration requirements could hamper venture activity.

He said that the venture capital industry’s activities were “not interwoven with US financial markets” and that
venture capital investment does not qualify as posing systemic risk for the following reasons:

*Venture capital firms are not interdependent with the world financial system

Sponsored Content

*The venture capital industry is small in size

*Venture capital firms do not use long-term leverage or rely on short-term funding

“We do recognise the need for transparency into our activities and, in that spirit, venture firms have provided information to the SEC for decades,” he said.

“We believe this information remains sufficient to meet the need for transparency without burdening our firms with additional regulations that do not further the understanding of systemic risk. We agree that those entities and industries which could cause financial system failure should be better monitored so that the events of 2008 are never repeated. However, venture capital is not one of those industries. Our size and operations within the private market do not pose broader financial risk.”

Should hedge fund managers be forced to register with the SEC?

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Peter Bernstein: Risk Inverse

Peter Bernstein, an economic consultant and respected investment thinker passed away on Friday June 5 in New York. Widely regarded as an intellectual giant in the investment circles for his ability to translate complex mathematical models into practical applications, he founded the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1974 and wrote a number of respected books

…as consultant assessment initiates changes to internal equity team and technology

CalPERS has reached its capacity to internally manage equities portfolios and would need to make changes to technology and staff resources if the internally-managed equities program is expanded, according to the outcome of the annual consultant review of CalPERS’ internal equity team by Wilshire Associates. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Asset class review inspires opportunistic allocation at CalPERS’

CalPERS is considering adopting an “opportunistic” program seeking to profit from substantially undervalued assets across various asset classes and strategies, and will be limited to 3 per cent of the fund’s total market value. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The future of risk management: How independent should risk management be?

Barry Schachter, research associate with the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre and director, quantitative resources, Moore Capital Management believes the current crisis is a catalyst for change in the conduct of risk management because it has challenged the efficacy of the existing risk management model, but simply imposing regulation is not the change

SWFs struck at financial crisis epicentre: $50b in losses from financials

For their biggest public market investments in the last two years, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) zeroed-in on the most dogged companies in the worst-performing sector: Western financials. These decisions incurred paper losses of $US56.3 billion, accounting for most of their public market losses for the period. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Working hard for the money

Last year large institutional investors in the US, including the State of Massachusetts Pension Fund and CalPERS, dedicated money to senior bank loans. Amanda White examines the outlook for the sector and talks to group head of ING’s senior loan group, Jeff Bakalar, about whether institutional allocations to the sector have been tactical or strategic.

Previous