CalPERS’ securities lending loss

CalPERS will continue its securities lending program following an annual review, despite significant pressure on its collateral pool, with income of $220 million generated for the year to March but unrealised losses on the internal collateral reinvestment of $854 million.

In a report to the board, the fund’s consultant, Wilshire said the significant unrealised loss in the collateral pool is likely to result in a total eventual loss to the fund of between $500 million and $1 billion.

This is due to the drop in prices on a lot of instruments purchased by CalPERS, with some securities defaulting or expected to default.

In an effort to limit any additional losses, the investment team has restricted all new investments to overnight securities, as they work out the damage to the collateral pool.

The internal staff annual review of the securities lending program confirmed the use of the program, a decision endorsed by Wilshire’s assessment.

In the past 12 months the fund held four auctions awarding more than $113 billion in assets to 11 borrowers, and in the past eight years CalPERS has auctioned off access to $835 billion in assets through 33 separate auctions, with cumulative net earnings of $1.4 billion.

Sponsored Content

Despite the failure, and merger, of several large counterparties over the past year, CalPERS has suffered no losses from defaults in any of its securities on loan.

According to Wilshire, CalPERS, like other lenders, requires over-collateralisation for all loans, and has simply kept the collateral, for no gain or loss, when a counterparty defaulted or declared bankruptcy. CalPERS had lent money to Lehman Brothers but incurred no losses on its default.

For the year to the end of March 2009, the average market value of securities on loan for the year was $33.5 billion, with annualised earnings of 23 bps. The large unrealised loss amount was due to CalPERS use of mark-to-market accounting on the valuation of the internal cash pool, which is not market convention on collateral reinvestment pools. The external portfolios use amortised cost pricing.

“This success reinforces the value of the auction platform and the demand in the marketplace to borrow CalPERS’ - the internal staff report said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous