CalPERS limits derivatives use

In line with its recently-approved leverage policy, the $181 billion fund for Californian public employees, CalPERS, has reviewed its derivatives policy for global equities, with notional leverage constrained to a new limit of 10 per cent of the value of the global equities portfolio.

In addition, guidelines to implementing derivatives will be written to cover each derivative strategy in CalPERS’ investment office.

At a minimum those guidelines will include: the purpose of the derivative strategy; justification for the use of derivatives; a description of the risks inherent in the strategy and how they will be managed including pricing, liquidity and legal risk; and procedures for monitoring and managing the derivative exposure relative to the strategy including protocols for prompt reporting of the violation of limits.

This new derivatives policy brings the existing synthetic enhanced equity portfolios in line with the recently-approved leverage policy, which was adopted in May and set out various definitions of leverage and methods for monitoring leverage across all of CalPERS assets.

In the leverage policy, “notional leverage” is defined as “exposure to non-cash-like-securities, that exceeds the value of the capital employed”.

In the most recent asset allocation review, approved this month, the allocation to global equities was reduced to 49 per cent (from 56 per cent).

Sponsored Content

Within its internally managed enhanced equities portfolio, the investment team is permitted to use financial futures, equity swaps and options permitting the investment dividends received, equitise cash and dividends receivable; adjust portfolio risk characteristics in the most cost-effective manner; and facilitate investment of cash flows related to contributions, withdrawals, or asset allocation compliance.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous