CalPERS reviews consultant requirements as it goes to tender

CalPERS has expanded the scope of services required by its primary pension consultant, including the provision of more strategic advice and better communication between board and staff, as part of an RFP for a general consultant to be released in December. The contract with Wilshire Associates, the fund’s consultant since 1983, is due to expire in June next year.
The revised scope of services calls for the primary pension consultant to provide more strategic perspectives on market trends and potential investment opportunities, facilitate better communication between the board and CalPERS staff, and provide additional review and reporting transparency to the board.

There are two new categories under the monikers of special advisor and communications and reporting.

The role of special advisor will be to advise the board, investment committee and staff on investment opportunities and provide independent analysis of the CAlPERS total prtofolio, its programs and investment partners.

It includes advice on new investment vehicles and techniques or major changes in existing practices within the industry, and preparing a comprehensive analysis and recommendation of these activities.

With regard to communications, the new requirement is to provide regular written recommendations, reports and inputs to the board tdo keep them informed and abreast of pertinent matters relating to the total portfolio.

CalPERS conducted research of best practices in the use of primary pension consultants throughout the investment community, and then staff proposed changes to the services for the primary pension consultant.

Sponsored Content

An evaluation committee will score technical and fee proposals submitted by the filing deadline and the investment committee has the option of conducting oral interviews.

Wilshire was hired as the fund’s first consultant in 1983 and has remained its consultant through a number of competitive tenders since that time.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous