Australia’s Future Fund looks to tangibles

The A$72.9 billion ($78.9 billion) Australian Future Fund will ramp up its tangible asset investments this quarter to more than 14.5 per cent of the fund with a long-term goal of lifting that to 25 per cent, a spokesman said.

In its recent quarterly update tangible asset investments in property, infrastructure and timberland made up more than 10 per cent of the fund, but is expected that this will rise to 14.5 per cent of the fund by the end of June, the spokesman said.

On its current size this would mean investments in these assets will top more than $11.3 billion billion by June.

In its quarterly update the Board of Guardians said they would continue to build towards its target asset allocation, with a focus on private equity in addition to property and infrastructure.

The Future Fund achieved a 3.9 per cent return for the quarter ending March 31 (excluding Telstra), giving a return for the first nine months of the financial year of 11.7 per cent.

Despite scaling back its investment in the Telco giant, its Telstra portfolio also returned a surprisingly robust 8.2 per cent for the quarter, to claw back a 0.2 per cent return for the first nine months of the financial year.

Sponsored Content

Global equities in developed markets make up the biggest proportion of its investment (22.7 per cent) with debt securities the next largest at 19.5 per cent.

On a yearly comparison, the Future Fund has maintained the proportion of its overall investments in developed market equities. It has also boosted its alternative assets investment from 12.3 per cent to 16.3 per cent and shed its cash holdings from 16.5 per cent to 11 per cent.

Including its Telstra holdings the fund is now worth more than $80 billion and has averaged a 5.3 per cent return per annum since launching in 2006.

Asset Owner:Future Fund

One response to “Australia’s Future Fund looks to tangibles”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous