Asia-Pacific’s first life settlement swap

The $15.2 billion ($11 billion) New Zealand Superannuation Fund has ploughed $80 million into the Asia-Pacific region’s first life settlements swap, in a deal organised by Credit Suisse’s Sydney-based fixed interest investment banking team.

NZ Super purchased through Credit Suisse a long-duration swap intended to mimic the long-term ownership of a pool of underlying life insurance policies, which have been bought on the American life settlements market.

“How it works is that we pay synthetic premiums on the in-force policies and receive a benefit on each policy maturity,” an NZ Super spokesperson said.

“The anticipated IRR is commercially sensitive, however to make any investment we have to be convinced that it will contribute to our overall performance expectation of beating NZ T-Bills by 2.5 per cent or more over rolling 20-year periods.”

Unveiling the life settlements investment (but not the counterparty) in its 2008/09 annual report last month, the NZ Super Guardians offered a careful explanation to the New Zealand public.

Sponsored Content

“Life settlements are where an insured person transfers the payout benefit of their life insurance policy to a third party, in order to realise a significantly greater than usual surrender value for the policy than from the original insurer. The third party maintains the premiums and receives the payout when the insured person dies. The investment improves the diversification of the Fund as the returns from life settlements are uncorrelated with returns from financial markets. The Guardians do not own individual policies. Rather, the Fund’s exposure is a contract underpinned by a
pool of policies.”

“It remains the case that the returns from the portfolio are directly linked to deaths. The portfolio consists entirely of policies belonging to insured people in the United States where life settlements regulation has been tightened due to ethical concerns relating to privacy, transparency of documentation and manipulation of the insured people. The Guardians are very conscious of these concerns and the investment sourcing process has a number of safeguards accordingly. These include ensuring that each insured person has their own advisor; that the insured’s spouse and all beneficiaries named in the policy sign the transfer document and that the investment manager has a
“closing call” with the insured to ensure they have understood the transaction before it is finalised.”

The NZ Super spokesperson said the life settlements investment had not attracted any attention from the country’s tabloid press as yet, unlike in Australia where investors such as the Victorian Funds Management Corporation
have been castigated for buying into “death funds”.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous