…as executives take pay-cut

The board of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board will not award the individual component of executive’s short term incentive plans, due to current economic circumstances, however the chief executive and the three key investment professionals still earned a combined C$8.6 million in total compensation in the fiscal year to March.

This remuneration total is about $3.894 million less than the 2008 fiscal year, when the four executives earned $12.4 million collectively.

Set up in June 2005 and updated in March 2007, the CPPIB has an incentive compensation framework which means the chief executive, the chief financial officer, and three investment professionals – head of private markets, head of public markets, and head of real estate – all have compensation determined by a base salary combined with short-term and long-term incentive plans.

The individual components of those short-term incentive plans will not be paid this year and the key executives will not receive any base salary increases in 2010.

In the past year the chief executive, David Denison, was the CPPIB’s highest paid executive with a total remuneration of $2.9 million for the year; followed by head of private markets, David Wiseman, ($2.49 million); head of public markets, Donald Raymond ($1.67 million), and head of real estate investments, Graeme Eadie ($1.42 million).

The target short term incentive plan is set as a percentage of salary, to which a multiplier, based on actual fund performance and individual performance, is added.

Sponsored Content

Similarly the target long term incentive plans is set as a percentage of salary and are paid at the end of a four-year cycle.

Executive compensation is closely linked to a combination of individual and CPP Fund performance measures, and for 2009, the CPPIB also established a series of non-financial goals including continued diversification of the investment portfolio, and execution of management and operational processes and technologies.

In particular Denison had personal objectives that included continuing to champion and foster the CPPIB’s culture; ensuring the successful integration of the offices in Toronto, London and Hong Kong; overseeing the cooperation of a comprehensive enterprise risk management framework, and building credit capabilities.

In the CPPIB annual report, the board particularly noted the CEO’s strong leadership.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous