Arizona expands allocation ranges, freezes private investments

The $27 billion Arizona State Retirement System has extended its asset allocation ranges and postponed the approval of new commitments to private market investments until the end of June, unless an overriding investment opportunity exception exists.

The delay on new private market allocations is an extension of the fund’s decision in January to postpone until March allocations to investments with locked-up capital in private equity, private real estate, opportunistic investment. The fund has a target allocation of 6 per cent to real estate, and 5 per cent to private equity, with a zero allocation to opportunistic, but a range of up to 5 per cent.

At the fund’s investment meeting last week the committee decided to extend its asset allocation ranges on equities and fixed income from plus or minus 5 per cent, to 10 per cent, in the hope an extended range may reduce the need for rebalancing that is inconsistent with the ASRS relative value perspective.

The proposed new ranges are 35 to 55 per cent for US equity, 8 to 28 per cent for international equity, and 16-26 per cent for US fixed income. Prior to this approval the ranges were 26 to 36 per cent for US large cap equities, 5 to 9 per cent for US mid cap equities, and 5 to 9 per cent for US small cap equities. At the moment there is an 18 per cent allocation to international equities, and a 26 per cent allocation to US fixed income.

The fund’s investment management division, along with consultants New England Pension Consultants (NEPC) and Mercer, also recommended the opportunistic investment committee consider rescinding the approval of global tactical asset allocation mandates and reclassify the funds allocated to US equity, and non-US equity and fixed income.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous