Alternatives the winner of long-term allocation shifts

Allocations to alternative investments of the largest seven pension markets globally (P7) have increased by 15 per cent over the past 16 years, according to Towers Watson.

Carl Hess, Towers Watson’s global head of investment, says the study reflects two investment themes in the past few years: globalisation and diversification.

While alternatives have increased as part of this diversification trend, in part he says, the increase has also been due to “packaging and mainstreaming” of the products.

The average asset allocation to alternatives has increased from 5 to 20 per cent from 2005 to 2011, with a corresponding reduction in equities, bonds and cash.

The US has seen the largest change to its alternatives allocation (5 to 25 per cent), followed by Switzerland (9 to 28 per cent), Netherlands (1 to 14 per cent) and Australia (14 to 24 per cent).

According to the Towers Watson Global Pension Asset Study, the aggregate P7 asset allocation at 2011 was 41 per cent equities, 37 per cent bonds, 20 per cent alternatives and 2 per cent cash.

Sponsored Content

This contrasts with the 1995 allocation of 49 per cent equities, 40 per cent bonds, 5 per cent alternatives and 6 per cent cash.

In particular the allocation to equities in the UK has dramatically fallen, from 67 to 45 per cent over the past 10 years.

Hess says he believes equities across the globe remain high, and “questions whether bond allocations could be up a bit more”.

“Many funds will be de-risking in the next 10 years,” he says.

Another investment trend has been a reduced home bias in equities, with the weight of domestic equities in pension equity portfolios falling on average from 64.7 per cent in 1998 to 48.1 per cent.

The US still invests the least in overseas equity markets, and Canada has the lowest level of home bias.

Consistent with the defined contribution nature of the market, Australia has a higher than average allocation to equities, while Japan and the Netherlands has a higher than average allocation to bonds.

In the past 10 years defined contribution assets of the largest seven pension markets has grown from 38.3 to 43.1 per cent.

Australia has the largest defined contribution proportion, with 81.1 per cent of the market in defined contribution.

In the UK defined contribution has grown from 8 to 39 per cent of the market in the past 10 years, and in the Netherlands that has grown from 2 to 7 per cent.

Towers Watson’s annual study shows that assets of the 13 largest pension markets accounted for $27.509 trillion, representing a 3.9 per cent rise from the year before.

The largest pension markets are the US (58.5 per cent of the total pension assets in the study), Japan (12.2 per cent), UK (8.7 per cent), followed by Canada, Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland.

Australia has had the highest growth rate in the past 10 years, followed by South Africa, Brazil and Hong Kong.

Hess says that the global ageing phenomenon will be a key theme for all pension market in the next 20 years.

“That demographic, and the fact they are more conservative with money, will impact markets in the next 20 years.”

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

Risks are multi-faceted and evolving: Litterman

If Robert Litterman were a CIO of a public pension plan he would not try to hit an “unrealistic return target”. Amanda White speaks to him about risk, quants, asset allocation and climate change. There is a serious problem with US public pension funds and the “unrealistic commitments and unrealistic return targets” they have set,

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Finding wriggle room in North Dakota

The monthly income pouring into the $1.3-billion North Dakota Legacy Fund arrives as thick and fast as fracking technology and new pipeline networks can draw the state’s oil and gas reserves to the surface. But investment strategy at the fund, set up in 2008 when it was portioned 30 per cent of the tax dollars

Innovating investment beliefs

The concept of investment beliefs is the basis for strategic management and, while widely used in other parts of the world, is “innovative” from a US perspective, Allan Emkin, managing director of Pension Consulting Alliance, says. In a session at the Risk Summit, convened by World Pension Forum and Conexus Financial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Emkin

Assessing reality in US public funds

Distinct regulation of United States public pension funds that links the liability discount rate to expected return on assets, rather than to the riskiness of their promised benefits, sets them apart – in a bad way. US public funds have underperformed other pension fund cohorts because of higher allocations to risky assets. Arguably, regulation is

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Previous