New decision making parameters for Alaska’s investments

The $38.5 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) has made further enhancements to its unique approach to investment decision making, clarifying procedures relating to risk guidelines in its investment policy.

The investment policy outlines via colour codes, different operating zones which allow for various decisions to be made with, or without board approval, and correlate to the riskiness of investments.

There are three zones – green, yellow and red – with the policy outlining that the portfolio must be within the green zone at least 80 per cent of the time. The green zone is the board approved, chief investment officer operating zone.

In December the board expanded the communications and procedures for the riskier zones of yellow and red.

The amended policy clarified each required step to enter into the yellow and red zones, including the steps required to extend operating in the zones. The policy had previously been less clear about extending approval for operating in these zones and the procedures required for notifying those needed to approve it.  The updated policy has also made provisions for the board to be provided with a historical report showing periods of operating within the yellow and red zones at board meetings.

Changes to the APFC investment policy also clarified that any weighting above 20 per cent to a single portfolio manager or investment vehicle within a distressed, mezzanine or credit opportunity mandate must be approved in writing by the executive director upon recommendation of the CIO.

Sponsored Content

Previously the policy did not specify who was required to provide the written approval. The amended policy also removed the restriction on the investment life of general partnerships, increasing the partners’ ability to invest in distressed debt funds. The policy previously limited investment life to December 31, 2022.

These changes follow on from the introduction of a new way of classifying its investments in 2009 and demonstrate APFC’s continual strive to make changes to ensure the fund is well positioned to provide benefits for Alaskans now and in the future.

One response to “New decision making parameters for Alaska’s investments”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

UniSuper’s proprietary risk program challenges investment assumptions

UniSuper, the $23 billion Australian pension fund for those working in higher education and research, has developed an in-house risk budgeting and factor analysis program that monitors the extent to which the fund deviates from its strategic asset allocation, and ensure the fund’s active risk is allocated appropriately between managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

Due diligence protocols improve manager selection

Adoption of the Model Request for Proposal, developed by the CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity, is a step towards robust due diligence in the selection of money managers according to Matthew Orsagh, senior policy analyst with the Institute’s Capital Markets Policy Group. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Hedge fund investing to make a comeback – CaseyQuirk

Hedge fund investing will make a comeback but managers will need to address shortcomings in their business models in order to survive, according to a new report from specialist research firm Casey Quirk, prepared in conjunction with Bank of New York Mellon. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Inside Ontario Teachers’ – VFMC foray into Birmingham Airport

Leo de Bever, one of the key decision-makers in a co-investment deal to buy almost half of Birmingham International Airport and now CEO of AIMCo, tells Simon Mumme about the future scope and necessary resources, relationships and disciplines required for co-investment deals. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Dutch funds reduce risk as recovery plans kick in

Dutch pension funds have been forced to rejig their asset allocations, reducing risk in an attempt to meet stringent statutory funding requirements enforced by the Dutch regulator, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB). mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Corporates walk funding tightrope as DB plans falter

An analysis of defined benefit schemes around the world reveal they all face the same issues of severe underfunding, but what should they do about it? In recent weeks, some of the world’s largest consultants have warned of the liability blow outs facing corporates with defined benefit (DB) pension plans. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

Previous