Alaska focuses on infrastructure

Infrastructure co-investments will be a new area of focus for the $36.6 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, as reflected in changes to its strategic asset allocation last week.

In July 2009 the fund changed the way it allocated assets – looking at underlying risks or economic conditions, not asset buckets – with a view to building an all-weather portfolio. It came up with five categories: company exposures, real assets, special opportunities, interest rates and cash.

This latest asset allocation tweak sees company exposures increase by 2 per cent to 55 per cent of the allocation, and infrastructure increase from 3 to 4 per cent.

The special opportunities bucket has been reduced as a result from 21 to 18 per cent.

While the company exposures allocation has been increased, it will not require new mandates, as existing mezzanine debt and credit opportunity mandates have been transferred from the special opportunities bucket.

Within the special opportunities, Alaska has embraced the “external CIO” concept, and awarded seed mandates of $500 million to five managers – PIMCO, GMO, Bridgewater, AQR and Goldman Sachs.

Sponsored Content

At last week’s board meeting, changes to the infrastructure investment policy were approved to allow investments in infrastructure funds based on the recommendation of an independent fiduciary, and to add authority to co-invest subject to a board-approved process.

The 1 per cent increase in the target allocation will allow room for this asset class to grow over the next few years.

Infrastructure is part of the real assets exposure, which also includes real estate and TIPs.

The fund, which returned 20.6 per cent for the 2011 financial year, has re-elected Bill Moran (pictured) as chair and Steve Rieger as vice-chair at its annual meeting.

It is still without a chief investment officer following the resignation of Jeff Scott.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous