Alaska focuses on infrastructure

Infrastructure co-investments will be a new area of focus for the $36.6 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, as reflected in changes to its strategic asset allocation last week.

In July 2009 the fund changed the way it allocated assets – looking at underlying risks or economic conditions, not asset buckets – with a view to building an all-weather portfolio. It came up with five categories: company exposures, real assets, special opportunities, interest rates and cash.

This latest asset allocation tweak sees company exposures increase by 2 per cent to 55 per cent of the allocation, and infrastructure increase from 3 to 4 per cent.

The special opportunities bucket has been reduced as a result from 21 to 18 per cent.

While the company exposures allocation has been increased, it will not require new mandates, as existing mezzanine debt and credit opportunity mandates have been transferred from the special opportunities bucket.

Within the special opportunities, Alaska has embraced the “external CIO” concept, and awarded seed mandates of $500 million to five managers – PIMCO, GMO, Bridgewater, AQR and Goldman Sachs.

Sponsored Content

At last week’s board meeting, changes to the infrastructure investment policy were approved to allow investments in infrastructure funds based on the recommendation of an independent fiduciary, and to add authority to co-invest subject to a board-approved process.

The 1 per cent increase in the target allocation will allow room for this asset class to grow over the next few years.

Infrastructure is part of the real assets exposure, which also includes real estate and TIPs.

The fund, which returned 20.6 per cent for the 2011 financial year, has re-elected Bill Moran (pictured) as chair and Steve Rieger as vice-chair at its annual meeting.

It is still without a chief investment officer following the resignation of Jeff Scott.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous