Alaska fills special opportunities bucket with real return mandates

The Alaska Permanent Fund will appoint four real return managers in March next year to manage a total of $2 billion in mandates that will have very few restrictions, and has shortlisted five managers to fill the brief, as part of its special opportunities bucket that makes up 21 per cent of the total fund.

Mike Burns, executive director of the $34 billion fund, said through these mandates the fund’s investment staff and trustees could observe the investment thinking of the managers and that it was an educational opportunity for staff to observe “how people think differently to us”.

The few restrictions on the mandates will be real estate and illiquid assets with more than two year lockups, as well as the requirement that a senior investment officer come to at least one board meeting at least once a year.

The approved shortlist of managers are AQR Capital, Bridgewater Associates, GMO, Goldman Sachs Asset Management and PIMCO.

The board said that all five managers have demonstrated their ability to produce superior risk-adjusted returns, with lower volatility, smaller drawdowns and higher liquidity than the other search candidates. It is expected that the four final firms will be selected and funded by March 30, 2010.

Sponsored Content

Within the special opportunities bucket the fund has also invested in commercial mortgage backed securities, distressed debt, and absolute return and has undergone a search for mezzanine debt.

The process to select the real return managers has been in conjunction with Callan Associates and originated with a shortlist of 30 managers.

As reported by conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com the board took a different approach to asset allocation this year that is a good fit for an all-weather portfolio.

Rather than taking the traditional tack of grouping investments by asset class, the board decided to group investments by their risk and return profiles, and by the market condition or liability that each group is intended to address.

Asset allocation by economic conditions

Company exposures 53%

special opportunities 21%

real assets 18%

interest rates 6%

cash 2%

 

Asset allocation by traditional asset classes, 2009

stocks 38%

bonds 22%

real estate 12%

cash 2%

infrastructure 3%

absolute return strategies 6%

private equity 6%

other 11%

 

asset allocation by economic conditions, 2009

company exposure 53%

special opportunities 21%

real assets 18%

interest rates 6%

cash 2%

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous