ABP to submit recovery plan as coverage ratio falls 50%

ABP, the world’s third largest pension fund, faces serious underfunding as a result of the financial crisis and will have to submit a recovery plan to De Nederlandsche Bank by March 31.

The fund’s coverage ratio has fallen to 90 per cent at the end of 2008, due to a drop in the actuarial interest rate at the end of the year to 3.6 per cent, and a return on investments for the year of -20.2 per cent.

At the end of 2007 the fund had a coverage ratio of 140 per cent; with an actuarial interest rate of 4.9 per cent and a return on investments of 3.8 per cent. Once the coverage ratio falls below 105 per cent the fund is required to report to the Bank on its plan to eliminate the underfunding within three years, and that the value of the assets will be on the level specified by the Pensions Act within 15 years.

The fund’s chairman, Elco Brinkman, said like other pension funds ABP had suffered greatly from the consequences of the financial crisis, with its assets now sitting at 173 billion (US$223 billion).

“This crisis, which evolved very rapidly in the last few months of 2008, is the worst every in ABP’s history,” he said. “In the last quarter of 2008, the fund lost approximately 22 billion of the almost 80 billion ABP had made with investments after the dot-com crisis between 2003 and 2008. Our focus over the coming months will be on recovering the fund’s financial position.”

At the end of 2008 the fund, which has 2.6 million members, had US$57.7 billion (US$57.7 billion) in fixed income, US$63 billion in equities and alternatives; and US$77.7 billion in other investments.

Sponsored Content

The fund is required to set an actuarial interest rate, equivalent to the swap rate, in order to determine its forecast return on capital. While this now sits at 3.6 per cent, the fund has returned an average of 5.9 per cent over the past 15 years.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Corporates walk funding tightrope as DB plans falter

An analysis of defined benefit schemes around the world reveal they all face the same issues of severe underfunding, but what should they do about it? In recent weeks, some of the world’s largest consultants have warned of the liability blow outs facing corporates with defined benefit (DB) pension plans. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

Governance foiled by human folly at NY state fund

The third largest fund in the US, the $122 billion New York state pension fund, has recently been embroiled in a tale of greed, fraud, bribery and corruption, with a number of its alternative investment funds allegedly tainted by the wrong-doing of former employees of the state comptroller’s officer, including its former CIO. In this

Maybe it’s time to get back into the water, with a life jacket

Institutional investors have never been market timers, but in this editorial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Greg Bright, argues maybe now is the time for pension plans to take a bet. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Volatility sparks complete risk management review at CalPERS

Turmoil in financial markets and the need for greater transparency has triggered a review of the $174 billion CalPERS’ existing governance and risk management framework, with a new ad hoc committee tasked with reviewing the risk management framework across the entire business. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

AustralianSuper aims for beta returns after big cuts to active equities

The A$28billion (US$20 billion) AustralianSuper terminated several mandates with active equities managers last week and directed most of the freed-up capital to passive exposures bringing its passive management in equities to more than 50 per cent, in an effort to simplify its portfolio by trimming excess managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Embrace risk in asset allocation

Investors should be wary of “new paradigm” arguments, according to the latest research by consulting firm Wurts & Associates, which reminds investors the forces driving capital markets rarely change, but the position within market cycles is ever changing. Wurts & Associates’ philosophy on strategic asset allocation is that static portfolio structure is an ineffective means

Previous