A look into the future of investing

A paper by the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of Investing, Innovations in Long-Term Capital Management, the Practitioner’s Perspective, examines the changing nature of investment decision making and governance and showcases investors who are innovating to take benefit from their comparative advantage.

It’s the age of the asset owner – which are more aware and better resourced than ever before. The paper highlights investors who have become significantly more conscious of the investment management value chain and the need for innovation. Many asset owners recognise that in order to sustainably reduce inefficiencies along their investment management value chain, they must first improve their own processes and capacity for innovation, the paper says.

The underlying premise of the white paper is that the future of investing lies in the ability to create new sources of wealth, rather than simply recycle claims on existing wealth. This means recognising where technology, demographics and inequality enable defensible profits and where they do not; and mitigating the greatest risk to sustainable new wealth creation – the insidious shortening of investment horizons that has been synonymous with rapid informational efficiencies.

The Global Agenda Council on the Future of Investing surveyed 21 major asset owners and managers to identify trends in their efforts to adapt to economic, financial and regulatory developments. While there were many variations in the way asset owners were adapting and innovating, in all examples, robust governance frameworks, rapidly advancing technological change and empowered leadership were enabling and driving innovation by these investors.

The WEF white paper, Innovations in long-term capital management: the practitioner’s perspective, outlines the result of that survey and showcases examples of how asset owners have invested in their knowledge capital, the resulting changes in their investments, and the implications for putting these new ideas into practice. Some examples are through responsible investing in real estate, investing in innovation, new approaches to asset allocation, thematic investing and manager flexibility.

The white paper clearly demonstrates the trend that asset owners are investing in their own capability and resources as a way of increasing their chances of success. From this increasingly self-sufficient and sustainable platform, they are innovating to both increase their operational efficiency and identify the areas in which their comparative advantages enable this wealth creation.

Sponsored Content

Alison Tarditi, chief investment officer of Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation, who is chair and member of the WEF’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of Investing, says there are a number of variables forcing asset owners to look at different investments. These include: the prospect of an extended period of low returns, the life stage and professionalisation of institutional asset owners, regulation, technological innovation.

“Asset owners are investing in their own capacity for innovation and governance is the key,” she says. “Good governance is all about strong organisational self-awareness; the simple but powerful realisation that the way the organisation is structured will affect its ability to leverage knowledge adaptively and be successful. We don’t have to all be the same but we do all need to have a candid self awareness, reflected in a focus on our purpose and unique comparative advantage.”

What the innovators have in common

The common thread among those funds that were innovating were governance first, that diversification relates to risk not assets, implementation remarries ownership and control, and extending connectivity outside the traditional investment ecosystem.

All of the asset owners in the survey reported having culled their external relationships and increased the size of their mandates to a smaller number of investment partners.

“Complete internalisation of the entire investment manufacturing chain is still considered counter to the dominant trend of identifying and exploiting comparative advantage. What has changed is asset owners’ ability to identify, price and react to inefficiencies within their supply chain. This should support innovation across the investment ecosystem, enable capital to be efficiently allocated to previously unexploited opportunities…” the paper says.

This paper is all about the long-term practitioner’s view, and the idea the industry needs to slow down and push back on the “insidious shortening of time horizons,” Tarditi says.

“The short term nature that some companies exhibit is failing to satisfy,” she says.

“The whole premise of the paper is that the future of investing is in the creation of new wealth, not the recycling of claims on old wealth. Asset owners are increasingly focused on the most efficient ways to finance real economic activity to productive ends.”

The paper “clusters” asset owners into three groups on how they innovate: by leveraging first-mover advantages; by leveraging the tenet that diversification relates to risk, not assets; and by remarrying asset ownership with control.

While the approach taken by each institution was different, five principles of effective investment governance were common. All the innovators had:

Strong organisational awareness. The simple but powerful realisation that the way the organisation is structured will inevitably affect its ability to create, maintain and leverage knowledge adaptability

Clarity and consistency of purpose

Candid self-awareness. This is reflected in a realistic assessment of areas of comparative advantage (to which they purposefully resource) and areas of weakness (which are either avoided altogether or outsourced)

  • Transparency. This supports accountability that, over time, build credibility with all stakeholders and underpins the appropriate extension of the investment horizon

A culture of learning and recognising failure early on. This enables organisational flexibility and empowerment from the bottom up.

 

The WEF white paper, Innovations in long-term capital management: the practitioner’s perspective, is available here: WEF_GAC Future of Investing Executive Summary

The case studies are available here: GAC16_Future_of_Investing_Case_Studies

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Previous