New guide for implementing climate risks

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

The Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) have worked together to produce a practical guide for companies looking to implement the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

While more than 600 organisations have supported the TCFD, the implementation of its recommendations have been slow, so CDSB and SASB have drawn on their well-established reporting frameworks to produce the guide that shows companies, in a very practical way, how to implement the recommendations.

Director of research at SASB, David Parham, said there has been great interest from companies wishing to manage their exposure to climate risk, demonstrated by their commitment to the TCFD proposals.

“But one of the challenges has been in companies needing practical resources to implement the recommendations. Through our partnership, and our standards,we can give practical tools to companies to effectively implement.”

The guide is rooted in practical examples with “mock disclosures” created for three fictional companies in the oil and gas, automobile and agriculture industries.

“We chose those industries to show how each of them have very different climate-related risk exposure, and demonstrate how to use the tools to really robustly meet the TCFD recommendations – which can be done in any of those three industries using our guidance,” Parham said.

Sponsored Content

Institutional investors can take comfort in the fact that the frameworks used for disclosure are focused on disclosure information that is material to investors, Parham said.

“Investors can help advocate and encourage companies to use the framework so investors can get the information they need. It is also useful fromthe perspective of seeing how the quantitative metrics can inform an investors’ understanding of howthe companies are performing, and then interpret the effectiveness of a company’s governance of this risk and risk management of its strategy,” he said. “It can help investors see how important it is to have continuity and how KPIs help drive performance.”

It is also important for investors to have an understanding of how different reporting frameworks can work together to enhance the quality of information they are receiving, he added.

When the TCFD released its final recommendation in 2017, its chair Michael Bloomberg, who is also chair-emeritus of the SASB Foundation Board, said the widespread adoption of the taskforce’s recommendations would ensure that the effects of climate change become routinely considered in business and investment decisions.

“Adoption of these recommendations will also help companies better demonstrate responsibility and foresight in their consideration of climate issues. That will lead to smarter, more efficient allocation of capital, and help smooth the transition to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy,” he said in a letter to Mark Carney, chairman of the Financial Stability Board,at the launch of the report.

The premise of the new guide is to demonstrate that the principles-based TCFD recommendations can be less daunting to implement than they might originally appear.

 

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

PFZW’s IC chair explains why cutting equity names hones impact

Professor Dirk Schoenmaker, investment committee chair of the €250 billion ($291 billion) Dutch healthcare pension fund Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), whose expertise has helped inform its "3D" investment strategy, explains why less is more in an equity allocation with fewer stocks.

Data ‘slop’ and disinformation emerge as systemic risks for investors

Will AI-fuelled misinformation overwhelm investors’ ability to make sound decisions? The Thinking Ahead Institute’s Tim Hodgson examines the systemic risks of 'data slop' and why data provenance should be a strategic priority.

Why investors must engage on the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance

Will antimicrobial resistance derail decades of medical and economic progress, or can coordinated action avert a global crisis? Anastassia Johnson, researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute, examines the growing threat of drug-resistant infections and the role investors can play in driving sustainable solutions.

Norway’s KLP drops defence groups because of weapon sales to Israel

As geopolitical uncertainty leaves many European pension funds exploring how to invest more in defence, Norway's KLP has just divested two listed defence companies for selling weapons to Israel because of human rights concerns in Gaza.

UK investor group forms to highlight the importance of good governance

A group of UK pension funds have formed a new pressure group, the Governance for Growth Investor Campaign, to boost oversight of the companies in which they invest, warning that the British government’s sweeping overhaul of listing rules has watered down longstanding shareholder rights.

Canada’s anti-greenwashing rule sparks far-reaching impact for pensions

Canadian pension giants are grappling with the complex consequences of a national anti-greenwashing rule, which could leave businesses more exposed to legal challenges for issuing environmental claims. CPPIB’s retreat from its net zero target is an indication that compliance anxiety is adding complexity and divergence in climate reporting among funds.

Previous