GPIF keen on stewardship

"This is a home-made (with Photoshop) image of various currencies (U.S. dollars, Yen, British Pounds, credit card number, stock price changes) flying off into the distant right on a digital background.This image is huge: 300 dpi at 11 x 17"

The giant Japanese Government Pension Investment Fund (GPIF) is pushing its external managers to fulfil stewardship responsibilities and improve their own governance, as part of its conscientiousness as a “super-long-term investor”.

About 24 per cent of the fund is in domestic equities and it exercises its voting rights via external asset managers. Therefore, it fulfils stewardship responsibilities by promoting constructive engagement between its external asset managers and investee companies. In 2016, all of the fund’s external asset managers exercised their voting rights.

Targeting short-termism

The ¥144 trillion ($1.26 trillion) GPIF has clear expectations of its external managers around stewardship, including improving their own effective governance, exercising voting rights and integrating environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles.

This year, in addition to those tasks, GPIF is also asking external managers to establish a remuneration system for directors and employees of asset managers to prevent short-termism, and to look at passive management in the context of stewardship.

The fund is also calling for applications for more fund managers in passive Japanese equities.

Sponsored Content

About 80 per cent of the fund’s domestic equities are already in passive management.

In the qualitative assessments of GPIF’s external passive managers, the weighting to “activities of stewardship responsibilities” has been raised to 30 per cent, from 10 per cent. However, engaging fully with companies is difficult territory and some of the fund’s passive managers have indicated that the current fee structure does not provide enough compensation for the stewardship responsibilities they are asked to fulfil.

Of the fund’s 19 external domestic equities managers, 16 have signed the United Nations’ Principles for Responsible Investment, and seven have introduced independent outside directors.

In a formal summary report of its stewardship activities in 2016, GPIF indicated it would move away from one-way annual monitoring and toward constructive communication. It will also expand its stewardship activities to asset managers handling international equities. About 23 per cent of the fund is in foreign equities.

In the 2016 stewardship report, the fund states that: “It is essential for GPIF as a ‘universal owner’ (an investor with a very large fund size and a widely diversified portfolio) and a ‘super-long-term investor’…to minimise externalities of corporate activities (environmental and social issues, etc.) and to promote steady and sustainable growth of the overall capital market.

Equities managers step up efforts

The report also showed that all the fund’s domestic equities managers have set up or reinforced departments or committees dedicated to overseeing stewardship activities and stepped up their efforts to include continuous organisation-wide stewardship activities, not merely voting rights. They also all responded positively about ESG integration, although only a few of them have used ESG meaningfully in actual engagement.

Since 2001, the fund has returned 2.7 per cent annualised. It has been focusing on stewardship and ESG activities since May 2014, when it announced acceptance of Japan’s Stewardship Code.

More recently, it established a stewardship and ESG division comprising seven members – including two full-time staff members. And in November, it convened the Global Asset Owners’ Forum, to exchange ideas with global pension funds on ESG issues.

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Asset owners’ increasingly global diversity lens

More investors around the world are looking at how to invest with a diversity lens. Amanda White examines how investors in Japan, Sweden, the US and Canada are addressing the diversity question as part of their internal organisation and in their investments and the managers they work with.

Investors call for more transparency in climate disclosures

Investors including the French SWF wanting clarity around corporate carbon emissions call for mandatory disclosure.

Time for institutional investors to confront income inequality

A new toolkit from The Investment Integration Project, with support from the Generation Foundation, applies principles of systems-level investing to show how investors can confront income inequality and take actions that enhance their current policies and practices. William Burckart and Michael Musuraca from TIIP explain.

Church of Sweden manages concentration risk

The SEK10 billion Church of Sweden fund invests all its assets through a sustainability lens. It’s had stellar performance driven largely by a chunk of the fund invested in the Generation Investment Management global equity fund, an investment that was diluted last year to manage concentration risk. Amanda White spoke to CIO, Anders Thorendal.

Execution risk in net zero portfolios

Implementing net zero ambitions is a huge execution risk for investors, says Frederic Samama who warned of the risk of everyone doing the same thing at the same time.

How CalSTRS took on Exxon

In an unequivocal message to boards that climate inaction could cost them their positions, Exxon shareholders voted this week to replace atleast two of its directors with those that have experience in climate transition. It is a win for CalSTRS which has been vocal in its support of Engine No.1, the activist hedge fund that put forward the alternative directors. The proposal was also supported by CalPERS and New York State Common Retirement Fund.

Previous