ESG and alpha

Academics collide on the relationship between envi
Continue Reading

A Top1000funds.com subscription unlocks the full article

Join the global institutional investment platform read by the world's largest asset owners, fund managers and consultants.

New here

Create an account

Complimentary to register. We'll verify your details and grant access to the archive, our newsletters and the Asset Owner Directory (enhanced features coming soon).
Register now
Already a member

Sign in

Already activated your account? Sign in to continue reading and access your saved articles, preferences and member-only content.

5 responses to “ESG and alpha”

  1. Thomas Gillespie

    I perceive a couple of issues with the vast bulk of ESG research:
    1) Most of the research misses the main point of ESG in that it is a risk mitigation exercise and so the chief question needs to be “Do ESG/SRI finds have a lower core/tail risk than benchmark or comparable funds?”
    2) Good ESG stocks have value and size style biases which tend to dominate. Particularly strong G stocks and to a lesser extent strong S and E stocks. Good E stocks have a significant sector bias that at least some vendors strip out when rating the stocks. These biases tend to dominate returns when trying to answer the question “How much does the ESG rating differentiate stock performance over and above the sector, value and size biases?” Happily this is not the case with the Bebchuk, Cohen & Wang paper.
    The comments of Ms Simpson from CALPERS address the perspective of most institutional investors other than those with an overarching SRI/ESG mandate – ESG should be part of good investment management, but only a part. Now it is up to the academics to show the risk impact.

    1. Andreas Hoepner

      Hi Thomas, here tentative replies to your two questions:
      1) ESG stocks tends to have lower and tail specific risk (see the working papers of Kais Bouslah, or also Daniel Hann’s PhD or the Financial Review paper of Darren Lee)
      2) Any decent academic study should control for investment style biases. Even more so, cutting edge studies would control for investment styles at different geographical levels (e.g. if US value stocks are performing well at any point in time, this does not automatically also mean that value stocks are performing well globally).

  2. Duncan Paterson

    Mathew – happy to have a look at proposals – we’ve got an ESG service for govt bonds going back over 5 years: http://www.eiris.org/managers/ps_country_ratings.html

  3. Andreas Hoepner

    Mathew, you might want to check the development of ESG sovereign rating and conventional sovereign credit ratings over the last decade. You will probably like it … 😉 …

    Academic research in Business/Economics, unfortunately, takes 2-4 years to formally publish in peer reviewed journal and working paper platforms such as SSRN as used by academics to different degrees. So when you are expecting some research to exist but cannot find it, maybe drop an academic or the PRI Academic Network an email and there might be insights …

    [Amanda: Thanks, very nice article!]

  4. Mathew McCrum

    I am amazed that there hasnt been more research in ESG for government bonds. To me it makes more sense ESG investing in bonds that equities………….

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Real assets, public equity the key as Oregon PERS gets climate mandate

The US state of Oregon is on the cusp of passing a legislation that will require the $100 billion Oregon Public Employees Retirement System to invest in clean energy wherever possible as it aims for a net-zero portfolio by 2050.

Reconciling ethics and returns in pursuit of a sustainable economy

Can investors and governments balance financial returns with social equity, or will short-term gains prevail? Anastassia Johnson, researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute, tackles the complex debate about what makes a just transition.

Path to net zero requires honest dialogue about sustainable investing

Leading institutional investors at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Harvard said the industry could benefit from having a franker conversation about sustainable investments, both in terms of what climate goals are achievable on the path to net zero and what is behind the pushback on ESG funds.  

Why adaptation alone won’t solve the climate change conundrum

Is a narrowly defined transition likely to fail? The Thinking Ahead Institute’s climate transition working group has been exploring this thesis, writes the Institute’s co-founder Tim Hodgson.

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Kentucky CERS: Trustees push back on hurried oil and gas investment

The board of trustees for the $10 billion Kentucky County Employees Retirement System has knocked back the fund's request to invest in an oil and gas fund. It also expressed frustrations that a specially convened board meeting was called on short notice.

Previous