Axa gets behind tobacco-free portfolios

Axa divested from tobacco in 2016 making it one of the first global insurance companies to do so. It has taken that a step further and now doesn’t insure tobacco companies. Amanda White speaks to the chair of Axa, Denis Duverne, on why this is a natural part of the company’s strategy.

Amanda White: Why is it important for your portfolio to be tobacco free?

Denis Duverne: Tobacco kills 7.5 million people per annum and that is likely to grow with emerging markets getting more affluent. As investors we have a responsibility to invest responsibily and it makes no sense to be a health insurer and invest in tobacco

Has it had an impact on returns?

It is too early to say if it has impacted returns. At the time of the decision there was a big discussion at CalPERS and when they took the decision to divest I also made that decision. And then I started to make calls to other investors to introduce the idea of tobacco free portfolios. (CalPERS did well to snuff out tobacco)

We can only really have an impact if there are more sellers than buyers, so we need this intiative to grow

Sponsored Content

What is your opinion of divestment versus engagement as a way to influence companies?

This is very different from the energy debate. Our first big divestment was from coal, our initial stance was divestment from coal manufacturers and energy suppliers with more than 50 per cent revenue from coal. We could have an engagement with them because there is an alternative, but with tobacco there is no alternative. Engagement doesn’t make any sense. They are very smart people, and very decisive and we want to avoid them.

The decision has been very well received by employees and by investors. We went way beyond divesting, and have stopped insuring tobacco companies. Most decisions matter, the only way to have an impact

The decision to divest is consistent with your corporate responsibility strategy can you talk a bit more about that?

Our corporate responsibility strategy is part of our strategy, it is not something on the side. It is a three pronged approach.

First is climate – a 3 degrees world would be totally uninsurable so we are fully inline with our strategy so in line to invest with a climate sustainable strategy

The second is health, tobacco is one element of that. We also invest in medical research including prevention activities – health can improve a lot by prevention.

Inequality – the SDGs are good for society and we think we are can have an impact by providing insurance to those that don’t currently have it eg through micro finance

All companies, managers, owners and insurance companies should make sure the strategy is aligned with the SDGs and within that health, inequality and poverty are part of those objectives.

Tobacco kills and that will increase if we do nothing.

If you want to be consistent with your own objectives you should look carefully at tobacco free as part of the solution.

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Asset owners’ increasingly global diversity lens

More investors around the world are looking at how to invest with a diversity lens. Amanda White examines how investors in Japan, Sweden, the US and Canada are addressing the diversity question as part of their internal organisation and in their investments and the managers they work with.

Investors call for more transparency in climate disclosures

Investors including the French SWF wanting clarity around corporate carbon emissions call for mandatory disclosure.

Time for institutional investors to confront income inequality

A new toolkit from The Investment Integration Project, with support from the Generation Foundation, applies principles of systems-level investing to show how investors can confront income inequality and take actions that enhance their current policies and practices. William Burckart and Michael Musuraca from TIIP explain.

Church of Sweden manages concentration risk

The SEK10 billion Church of Sweden fund invests all its assets through a sustainability lens. It’s had stellar performance driven largely by a chunk of the fund invested in the Generation Investment Management global equity fund, an investment that was diluted last year to manage concentration risk. Amanda White spoke to CIO, Anders Thorendal.

Execution risk in net zero portfolios

Implementing net zero ambitions is a huge execution risk for investors, says Frederic Samama who warned of the risk of everyone doing the same thing at the same time.

How CalSTRS took on Exxon

In an unequivocal message to boards that climate inaction could cost them their positions, Exxon shareholders voted this week to replace atleast two of its directors with those that have experience in climate transition. It is a win for CalSTRS which has been vocal in its support of Engine No.1, the activist hedge fund that put forward the alternative directors. The proposal was also supported by CalPERS and New York State Common Retirement Fund.

Previous