Balancing fixed income risks amid rising uncertainty

This article was produced by Capital Group without involvement from the Top1000funds.com editorial team.

Uncertainty surrounding the impact of the US administration’s policy plans weighed on markets, including the implementation and reversal of tariffs, job cuts across the federal workforce and tightened immigration enforcement.

US growth momentum has slowed, with significant uncertainty in the outlook and risks likely skewed to the downside. Fundamentals had been resilient, with consumer spending supported by real income growth, firm labour market demand and relatively low unemployment on a historical basis. However, tariff announcements and broader policy uncertainty have contributed to weakening consumer and business sentiment and have the potential to negatively impact real incomes, business investment and inflation. Recession risks appear to be rising.

Inflation dynamics complicate the Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) policy decisions. Inflation implied by the Consumer Price Index and the core Personal Consumption Expenditures Index remains elevated. The Fed has indicated that it is seeking clarity on the impact of the Trump administration’s policies before it moves again, having cut the federal funds target rate by 100 bps in the last few months of 2024. Still, broader economic growth challenges and possible labour market weakness could lead to more cuts this year.

Potential policy changes from the Trump administration have raised the degree of uncertainty in the economic outlook and could weigh on global growth. The distribution of outcomes related to tariffs, taxes, regulation and international relations seems unusually wide. The initial impact of announced tariffs could meaningfully lower global growth. While the starting point for growth looks stronger in the US than in other global regions, the risks to the US seem skewed to the downside.

While economic fundamentals in many international regions currently look weaker than in the US, fiscal responses could be supportive over time. Following decades of a stable alliance, Europe is responding to a more isolationist US with increases in fiscal stimulus, which could in turn spur economic growth over the medium-to-longer term.

German stimulus and the EU’s plan to raise defense spending under ReArm EU are positive steps that should pave the way for closer European integration and faster growth in the coming years. Meanwhile, the European Central Bank appears set to lower interest rates, with the balance of risks tilted toward additional cuts given the growing chance of a trade war between the US and Europe.

Sponsored Content

In Asia, China has started to stabilise, although stimulus remains limited. That trend could change as Chinese officials look toward more fiscal measures to offset tariff risks.

Given heightened uncertainty, we are focused on building resilience and balance in portfolios. The implications of recently announced tariffs in the US could significantly alter the global growth picture, a scenario which markets are beginning to appreciate. We have looked to construct portfolios that reflect balanced risks across excess return drivers. We favour credit sectors where the income component is relatively more compelling.

We believe positioning for a steeper yield curve offers favourable risk-reward dynamics and could serve as a risk-off hedge to complement risk exposures elsewhere. In our view, the steepener position could benefit either in a worse-than-expected economic slowdown or with inflation and deficit dynamics driving long-term yields higher. We view duration more positively given that growth momentum is slowing, uncertainty is building and recession risks are rising. An underweight position in global duration could be beneficial as fiscal stimulus in non-US developed markets might cause the differential between US and non-US rates to narrow.

Within credit, we are maintaining an up-in-quality bias with a tilt toward more defensive areas of the market. This positioning reflects our concerns around increased macro and policy uncertainties. Though credit fundamentals have been sound, volatility and downside risks are likely to remain elevated. We believe select exposures across high-yield and emerging markets debt remain attractive, though credit selection is key.

We believe positioning for a steeper yield curve offers favorable risk-reward dynamics and could serve as a risk-off hedge to complement risk exposures elsewhere. In our view, the steepener position could benefit either in a worse-than-expected economic slowdown or with inflation and deficit dynamics driving long-term yields higher. We view duration more positively given that growth momentum is slowing, uncertainty is building and recession risks are rising. An underweight position in global duration could be beneficial as fiscal stimulus in non-US developed markets might cause the differential between US and non-US rates to narrow.

Within credit, we are maintaining an up-in-quality bias with a tilt toward more defensive areas of the market. This positioning reflects our concerns around increased macro and policy uncertainties. Though credit fundamentals have been sound, volatility and downside risks are likely to remain elevated. We believe select exposures across high-yield and emerging markets debt remain attractive, though credit selection is key.

 

To read more about Capital Group’s fixed income capabilities, click here

Leave a Comment

Why Asian equities’ growth will outlast the AI-driven semiconductor cycle

Why Asian equities’ growth will outlast the AI-driven semiconductor cycle

In the latest episode of the Fiduciary Investors Series, Liao spoke with Top1000funds.com Asia Pacific correspondent Darcy Song on why the convergence of innovation, demographics and improving shareholder returns makes Asian equities an increasingly compelling diversification trade for asset owners navigating a geopolitically fractured world.

Sort content by

The beauty and the beast of value and momentum investing

Are all value stocks and all momentum stocks equally attractive? In our research, we found that different types of value and momentum stocks exhibit very different performance characteristics. A value approach which incorporates some momentum and risk considerations tends to outperform a generic approach, but a value approach which intentionally goes against these factors significantly

Low turnover: a virtue of low volatility

Trading is necessary to follow an active strategy, but excessive trading is linked to human behavior. In his new paper just published on SSRN Pim van Vliet looked into why investors trade and how much trading is needed for an effective low-volatility strategy. For potential low-volatility investors the question arises: is turnover a good or

A good strategy starts with a good design

David Blitz discusses research to improve existing strategies and explains how he designs new ones. “Our mission is to make good strategies even better and to design the next generation.” Head of Equity Research David Blitz has been at the forefront of quant investing since 1995 and is responsible for coordinating all quantitative equity research.

Pioneers in factor investing

In 2014 Robeco went live with its Factor Investing Solutions: tailored solutions based on multiple factors. “Robeco is not the founder of factor investing, but we are among the first to translate the theory into practical investment solutions,” says Robeco’s Head of Factor Investing Research Joop Huij with pride. Read more about Robeco’s approach.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

The volatility effect: lower risk without lower return

Efficient markets theory has been challenged by the finding that relatively simple investment strategies are found to generate statistically significantly higher returns than the market portfolio. Well-known examples are the value, size and momentum strategies, for which return premiums have been documented in US and international stock markets. Market efficiency is also challenged, however, if

Beauty and the beast of low-volatility investing

Usually focusing on how to design the best low-volatility strategy, David Blitz, Matthias Hanauer and Pim van Vliet have set out to construct a very bad low-volatility strategy. Comparing good and bad low-volatility strategies they found very different performance characteristics. Clearly, not all low-volatility stocks are created equal. The results highlight the importance of being

Previous