Time to mend relationships in investment management

A new KPMG report, ‘Renewing the promise: Time to mend relationships in investment management”, shows the investment management industry should work to rebuild trust with investors through a ‘back-to-basics’ client relationship approach, increase knowledge sharing, and bolster corporate
governance and risk management transparency.

KPMG International commissioned Datamonitor to undertake the research which was launched at Fund Forum International in Monaco.

Overall, the results show that better communication holds the key to future success. These lines of communication should flow not only from investment managers to their clients, but also, crucially, from investment managers to intermediaries and to regulators, as they will play a fundamental role in repairing the trust that has been broken.

This message of the need for more effective communication manifests itself in a variety of ways, including calls by investors and intermediaries for additional training and transparency on product and strategy, for explicit vocalisation by investment managers of their adherence to an industry best practice code of conduct and for more direct, face-to-face time with managers.

In terms of the breakdown in trust, the research highlighted that financial intermediaries – client-facing advisors – in particular, are perceived as being untrustworthy and lacking knowledge, perhaps as a result of poor education by investment managers on complex products and risk management practices.

Sponsored Content

In fact, 77 per cent of investors overall felt that intermediaries are less trustworthy than politicians.

To combat this, 58 per cent of institutional investors believe that investment managers should provide financial intermediaries with better product training in order to help them regain client trust, a sentiment matched by 75 per cent of investment managers themselves.

Responding to the research, Tom Brown, partner and EMA Region of Investment Management, KPMG in the UK, said: “At this time of market turbulence and broken trust, the investment management industry should adapt and change to re-engage investors. Open communication amongst all market participants is particularly critical, and investment managers and intermediaries must forge collaborative, knowledge-based partnerships, focused solely on the client. Only by implementing a joined-up approach, supported by better corporate governance and risk management, can the needs of the investor truly be met.”

Notably, the research showed that managers do not have faith in their own senior-level management being able to drive this necessary change, especially with regards to risk management and corporate governance procedures:
65 per cent of investment managers globally cited lack of vision by top management as the major obstacle to change, leaping to a staggering 90 per cent of managers questioned in the US.

A lack of vision at the top is not the only obstacle to change and progress, however. The report also showed that the inevitable cascade of regulatory change is likely to significantly hamper the industry, with 81 per cent of respondents believing more regulation will remove opportunities for innovation going forward.

There are also significant concerns regarding the cost impact of a new regulatory regime; 72 per cent of participants feel that a regulatory clampdown will seriously increase costs for investment managers, and 63 per cent think investment managers will not be able to pass on these associated costs to their clients.

Commenting on regulation, James Suglia, global head of Investment Management Advisory, KPMG in the US, said: “The investment management sector is braced for regulatory change, and is ready to learn its lessons from the financial crisis. More than ever, the “time is now” for true engagement between the industry and the regulators to shape the future of the investment management landscape. Regulation has the potential to deliver a new lease of life through market stabilisation, information sharing and product transparency, but only by taking a consultative approach can the correct results be achieved.”

Not everyone is agreed on where this regulation will fall though. For example, 53 per cent of institutional investors believe that risk management and internal controls will be more strictly regulated in the future, whilst investment managers feel the focus will be on leverage limitations (77 per cent).

David Seymour, partner and global head of Investment Management, KPMG in the US, concluded: “Events of the past year have once again put the issue of trust into sharp relief, and it is fair to say that the credibility and reputation of the investment sector has been damaged. It is little wonder that investors, faced with the realities of plummeting stock markets and portfolios, have questioned the integrity of the investment management industry. This research clearly
shows that constituent parties in the investment chain are not communicating with each other to best effect. The industry should find ways to open these lines of communication once more, and by doing so, rebuild the trust of
investors.”

Click here to download the report.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Momentum in Japan works well: Asness

By studying value and momentum in Japan as a system, because they are strongly negatively correlated, this paper by AQR’s Cliff Asness argues that despite popular belief, momentum “works quite well” in Japan.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Making sense of China’s excessive foreign reserves

This analysis suggests that without a well-developed domestic financial market, the value of the Chinese currency (renminbi) may significantly depreciate, instead of appreciate, once the Chinese government abandons the linked exchange rate and the massive amount of precautionary savings of Chinese households are unleashed toward international financial markets to search for better returns.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content

The economics of hedge funds

This collaborative research examines the relationship between hedge fund managers’ fee structures and the amount of risk taken and among other things finds a “high-powered incentive fee” encourages excessive risk-taking, while management fees have the opposite effect.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Yale warns on ‘nanny’ reforms

Subjecting money market funds to a bank-like regulatory structure would disrupt the short-term money market and increase systematic risk according to this Yale Law School paper. While risk-limiting reforms are important to ensure the continued safety and security of MMFs, this paper argues major revisions such as the floating NAV requirement or bank-like regulation would

Some like it hot

Empirical literature and MSCI analysis show that high implementation costs indicate there is little evidence the average managers in either emerging market or small caps have produced either higher or more persistent risk-adjusted returns relative to their developed market and mid-cap peers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Inflation-linked bonds and their relative value as an inflation hedge

Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS) have a relatively unique profile within fixed income portfolios, which has important implications for investors’ setting of objectives and portfolio construction. This Towers Watson article explores the different motivations for using TIPS and other inflation hedges.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous