Time to mend relationships in investment management

A new KPMG report, ‘Renewing the promise: Time to mend relationships in investment management”, shows the investment management industry should work to rebuild trust with investors through a ‘back-to-basics’ client relationship approach, increase knowledge sharing, and bolster corporate
governance and risk management transparency.

KPMG International commissioned Datamonitor to undertake the research which was launched at Fund Forum International in Monaco.

Overall, the results show that better communication holds the key to future success. These lines of communication should flow not only from investment managers to their clients, but also, crucially, from investment managers to intermediaries and to regulators, as they will play a fundamental role in repairing the trust that has been broken.

This message of the need for more effective communication manifests itself in a variety of ways, including calls by investors and intermediaries for additional training and transparency on product and strategy, for explicit vocalisation by investment managers of their adherence to an industry best practice code of conduct and for more direct, face-to-face time with managers.

In terms of the breakdown in trust, the research highlighted that financial intermediaries – client-facing advisors – in particular, are perceived as being untrustworthy and lacking knowledge, perhaps as a result of poor education by investment managers on complex products and risk management practices.

Sponsored Content

In fact, 77 per cent of investors overall felt that intermediaries are less trustworthy than politicians.

To combat this, 58 per cent of institutional investors believe that investment managers should provide financial intermediaries with better product training in order to help them regain client trust, a sentiment matched by 75 per cent of investment managers themselves.

Responding to the research, Tom Brown, partner and EMA Region of Investment Management, KPMG in the UK, said: “At this time of market turbulence and broken trust, the investment management industry should adapt and change to re-engage investors. Open communication amongst all market participants is particularly critical, and investment managers and intermediaries must forge collaborative, knowledge-based partnerships, focused solely on the client. Only by implementing a joined-up approach, supported by better corporate governance and risk management, can the needs of the investor truly be met.”

Notably, the research showed that managers do not have faith in their own senior-level management being able to drive this necessary change, especially with regards to risk management and corporate governance procedures:
65 per cent of investment managers globally cited lack of vision by top management as the major obstacle to change, leaping to a staggering 90 per cent of managers questioned in the US.

A lack of vision at the top is not the only obstacle to change and progress, however. The report also showed that the inevitable cascade of regulatory change is likely to significantly hamper the industry, with 81 per cent of respondents believing more regulation will remove opportunities for innovation going forward.

There are also significant concerns regarding the cost impact of a new regulatory regime; 72 per cent of participants feel that a regulatory clampdown will seriously increase costs for investment managers, and 63 per cent think investment managers will not be able to pass on these associated costs to their clients.

Commenting on regulation, James Suglia, global head of Investment Management Advisory, KPMG in the US, said: “The investment management sector is braced for regulatory change, and is ready to learn its lessons from the financial crisis. More than ever, the “time is now” for true engagement between the industry and the regulators to shape the future of the investment management landscape. Regulation has the potential to deliver a new lease of life through market stabilisation, information sharing and product transparency, but only by taking a consultative approach can the correct results be achieved.”

Not everyone is agreed on where this regulation will fall though. For example, 53 per cent of institutional investors believe that risk management and internal controls will be more strictly regulated in the future, whilst investment managers feel the focus will be on leverage limitations (77 per cent).

David Seymour, partner and global head of Investment Management, KPMG in the US, concluded: “Events of the past year have once again put the issue of trust into sharp relief, and it is fair to say that the credibility and reputation of the investment sector has been damaged. It is little wonder that investors, faced with the realities of plummeting stock markets and portfolios, have questioned the integrity of the investment management industry. This research clearly
shows that constituent parties in the investment chain are not communicating with each other to best effect. The industry should find ways to open these lines of communication once more, and by doing so, rebuild the trust of
investors.”

Click here to download the report.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

The pitfalls of risk modelling

Many portfolio managers use multi-factor models, but these are only as good as the various inputs used to construct them. MSCI looks at how flawed-model construction can result in optimised portfolios that are not efficient. The paper, Is Your Risk Model Letting Your Optimized Portfolio Down?, reveals that faulty risk models tend to underestimate risk

Investors add to credit cycle

Reaching-for-yield — the propensity to buy riskier assets in order to achieve higher yields — is believed to be an important factor contributing to the credit cycle. This Harvard Business School finance working paper analyses this phenomenon in the corporate bond market. The paper’s authors Bo Becker and Victoria Ivashina show evidence for reaching for

Low vol strategies
can go global

S&P Dow Jones Indices’ researchers take a closer look at the long-term effectiveness of low volatility strategies in this paper. Aye Soe, S&P’s director of index research and design, analyses the low-volatility effect in the US equity market, with a focus on the common properties of various low-volatility strategies. Drawing from the extensive academic literature

New ways to calculate portfolio weights

This paper presents two simple algorithms to calculate the portfolio weights for a risk parity strategy, where asset class covariance information is appropriately taken into consideration to achieve “true” equal risk contribution. Previous implementations of risk parity either (1) used a naïve 1/vol solution, which ignores asset class correlations, or (2) computed “true” risk parity

OECD investigates
market fragility

In this fourth part of an OECD working paper, researchers look at the potential that portfolio rebalancing by financial investors can contribute to spreading financial turmoil in a major market event such as the global financial crisis or ensuing sovereign debt crisis in Europe. In International Capital Mobility and Financial Fragility – Part 4: Which Structural

How to find a safe haven in Europe

MSCI looks at how equity investors can find European stocks that offer some protection against the current volatility buffering markets. Zoltán Nagy and Oleg Ruban examine how the Barra Europe Equity model (EUE3) can be used to help identify stocks that are less sensitive to the unfavorable movements in troubled countries. Using the covariance matrix

Previous