Australia’s DC funds take on more risk than OECD peers

Pension funds in Australia allocate a higher proportion of assets to shares than pension funds in any other country, according to a survey which looked at the asset allocation of pension funds in selected OECD countries.


According to the OECD’s Pension Markets in Focus report, released in October, Australian funds allocate around 60 per cent to shares, while their US counterparts allocate about 46 per cent, Canadians 31 per cent and those in the Netherlands 37 per cent.

According to the report, strategic asset allocation changes in the past couple of years have been most noticeable in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, where there is evidence that defined benefit pension funds are reducing their target allocation to listed equities.

It also said there have been some investment developments common to defined benefit and defined contribution pension funds over the past decade that appear to have been maintained and, in some cases intensified, by the financial crisis. They included:

-Increased international diversification of equity portfolios;

-Increased use of derivatives to hedge both asset and liability risks; and

Sponsored Content

-Continuing exposure to alternative asset classes, including hedge funds, private equity and infrastructure.

Some of the highest exposures to international assets were observed among pension funds in the Netherlands. High exposures to assets denominated in foreign currencies were also found in other countries such as Hungary, Iceland, Japan and Switzerland.

Download the full report here

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Macroeconomic risk and hedge fund returns

This paper estimates hedge fund and mutual fund exposure to newly proposed measures of macroeconomic risk that are interpreted as measures of economic uncertainty. The academics, from Georgetown and Stern, find the resulting uncertainty betas explain a significant proportion of the cross-sectional dispersion in hedge fund returns. However, the same is not true for mutual

Active ownership

Academics from the London Business School, Boston College and Temple University, examine the outperformance of US public companies following corporate social responsibility engagement.

Capturing illiquidity premiums

This paper commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance investigates the possibilities for the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) to profit from liquidity premiums in  illiquid investments. It looks at the empirical evidence for the presence of liquidity effects in a broad range of asset classes: listed equities, corporate bonds, treasury and agency bonds, and

A trustee guide to factor investing

This research by academics at Tilburg University and the VU University Amsterdam, looks at the hurdles of implementing factor investing. It translates those into a checklist for implementing factor investing. The research, conducted for Robeco, finds that three approaches to factor investing are emerging and conducts case studies to examine how these approaches are implemented

Manager risk contribution in a multi-manager portfolio

This paper by MSCI creates a framework in order to answer the question: given a portfolio of managers, how does the active risk of each manager relate to the active risk of the portfolio? Asset owners often measure manager risk (the active risk of each manager) and have difficulty relating it to the contribution each

How active is your real estate fund manager?

Using detailed data from IPD, this paper looks at the holdings and performance of 256 UK commercial real estate funds from 2002-2011. It concludes the more active funds, those further from benchmark holdings, outperform but are not accompanied by higher risk.   To access the paper click here How active is your real estate fund

Previous