MSCI shines light in tax gap

A quarter of companies in the MSCI All Country World Index have a large tax gap, paying an average rate of 14.3 per cent versus the 31.8 per cent that would be expected, based on the jurisdictions where they generate revenue.

A new report from MSCI ESG Research shows that MSCI ACWI Index constituents with a tax gap would have faced additional annual tax liabilities of up to $220 billion if the entire tax gap had been plugged by regulatory reform.

In the report, MSCI ESG Research states it has seen growing demand from institutional investors for data and metrics to assist in understanding their exposure to emerging risks from global tax policy shifts. In response, it has addressed tax transparency under the corporate behaviour theme and developed a new data set and scoring mechanism within its ratings framework.

This will be rolled out in phases over the next few years. The first phase is focused on flagging companies potentially facing high regulatory, legal and reputational risks on tax-related matters, based on MSCI ESG Research’s assessment of the gap between the companies’ reported tax rate and the estimated statutory rate based on where a company generates revenue.

Investors can use this tax-gap analysis for possible engagement and to develop a more targeted set of companies from a broad, diversified universe for further due diligence.

The research also outlines the attributes that would make a company place poorly in rankings from the analysis: a high estimated tax gap; a lack of transparency around the geographical breakdown of revenue (for example, if less than 50 per cent of total revenue is disclosed in country-by-country form); and involvement in tax-related controversies in the last three years, such as regulatory fines or ongoing litigation.

Sponsored Content

 

The full report, The Tax Gap: Regulatory responses and implications for institutional investors, can be accessed here.

 

One response to “MSCI shines light in tax gap”

  1. A lack of transparency surrounding the breakdown of a company’s revenue is certainly an attribute that will make it placed poorly in rankings. And, naturally any involvement and tax related controversies does not shine a good light either.

Leave a Comment

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio has warned of a “material” increase in US recession risk compared to last year as the fund braces for a wider, “negatively skewed” distribution of outcomes in the next 12 months. It came as the mature plan, which is 81 per cent funded, is tilting to fixed income and new asset classes like liquid alternatives over equities.

Sort content by

The rise of the Sovereign Wealth Fund

In the past 20 years the number of SWFs has grown from 20 to more than 100 with their assets estimated to grow by $500 billion a year. So where do they invest and what impact are they having on the market? Sarah Rundell investigates.

Coronavirus: market impacts

The coronavirus has triggered a market correction, bringing the S&P 500 off its all-time high. But as always an analysis of fundamentals, and the relationship between price and value, is essential for allocating capital. So could this be a time to buy?

Minnesota to expand private markets

A strategic and long-term focus sees the Minnesota State Board of Investment CIO, Mansco Perry, adopt a patient and encouraging approach when it comes to climate change and diversity. The $104 billion fund is also looking to expand its allocation to private markets, and double its internal team.

Challenges for Germany’s pension funds

Opportunities exist to improve portfolio efficiency among Germany’s pension funds, but it will create additional governance requirements. The conservatism of the portfolios is seemingly more difficult to move and reflects the higher degree of comfort required by German investors. Head of investments in Germany for Willis Towers Watson argues it is important to note that the short-term comfort this may provide may well come at a long-term cost.

External equity: A worry at Wellcome

The £26.8 billion Wellcome Trust continues to reduce its allocation to external equities managers as the investment committee focuses on currency exposures, ESG and hedge funds,the impact of low interest rates and the position of the credit cycle in 2020.

Why benchmarks matter

The choice of benchmarks is one of the most fundamental decisions that investors make, but the time and respect it gets in the investment process is under-valued according to CIO of Verus Investments, Ian Toner, who explains why investors should care more about benchmark selection.

Previous