MSCI shines light in tax gap

A quarter of companies in the MSCI All Country World Index have a large tax gap, paying an average rate of 14.3 per cent versus the 31.8 per cent that would be expected, based on the jurisdictions where they generate revenue.

A new report from MSCI ESG Research shows that MSCI ACWI Index constituents with a tax gap would have faced additional annual tax liabilities of up to $220 billion if the entire tax gap had been plugged by regulatory reform.

In the report, MSCI ESG Research states it has seen growing demand from institutional investors for data and metrics to assist in understanding their exposure to emerging risks from global tax policy shifts. In response, it has addressed tax transparency under the corporate behaviour theme and developed a new data set and scoring mechanism within its ratings framework.

This will be rolled out in phases over the next few years. The first phase is focused on flagging companies potentially facing high regulatory, legal and reputational risks on tax-related matters, based on MSCI ESG Research’s assessment of the gap between the companies’ reported tax rate and the estimated statutory rate based on where a company generates revenue.

Investors can use this tax-gap analysis for possible engagement and to develop a more targeted set of companies from a broad, diversified universe for further due diligence.

The research also outlines the attributes that would make a company place poorly in rankings from the analysis: a high estimated tax gap; a lack of transparency around the geographical breakdown of revenue (for example, if less than 50 per cent of total revenue is disclosed in country-by-country form); and involvement in tax-related controversies in the last three years, such as regulatory fines or ongoing litigation.

Sponsored Content

 

The full report, The Tax Gap: Regulatory responses and implications for institutional investors, can be accessed here.

 

One response to “MSCI shines light in tax gap”

  1. A lack of transparency surrounding the breakdown of a company’s revenue is certainly an attribute that will make it placed poorly in rankings. And, naturally any involvement and tax related controversies does not shine a good light either.

Leave a Comment

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio has warned of a “material” increase in US recession risk compared to last year as the fund braces for a wider, “negatively skewed” distribution of outcomes in the next 12 months. It came as the mature plan, which is 81 per cent funded, is tilting to fixed income and new asset classes like liquid alternatives over equities.

Sort content by

NZ Super debates currency risk

NZ Super's recent five-year reference portfolio review saw much debate over currency risk, with the discussion elevating to the board - an unusual situation for the fund whose internal IC usually makes recommendations to the board.

Students show how to integrate impact

As impact investing gains momentum, the winning entries of a McGill University international investment challenge have shown the pension industry a thing or two about how to holistically tackle a triple mandate that includes impact.

Scenario analysis tool predicts U-shape

A U-shaped recovery is the most likely economic outcome in the US for the next two years, but stagflation has a higher than anticipated chance of occurring according to a new paper about scenario analysis co-authored by State Street and GIC researchers. The study revolutionises scenario analysis by reorienting it towards a path.

Florida: Opportunities in a crisis

The Florida State Board of Administration has made some strategic moves to take advantage of opportunities in the dislocation, including in private equity, distressed debt and active listed equities.. But CIO, Ash Williams, is concerned about the underlying real economy.

Canadians more complex than first glance

The Canadian model, revered world over for its supreme pension management, is not low cost despite that being one of its oft-described traits. New research by CEM Benchmarking and McGill University shows that these funds are cost efficient, rather than being low cost. Their aim is to be high net performers, not low cost.

IMCO uses nimbleness to advantage

Meticulous planning for the next market crash, and an eye on liquidity, meant IMCO was well positioned to invest, particularly in credit, when the opportunity arose. The fund continues to use its agility to its advantage and is now looking for opportunities in private markets.

Previous