Longer horizons lead to more investment

The impact that length of investment horizon has on pension funds’ allocations to illiquid assets was the subject of a new study by Dutch researchers. The authors, Dirk Broeders, Kristy Jansen and Bas Werker, looked at the asset allocation of 220 Dutch defined benefit pension funds from 2012-16.

They took liability duration as a proxy for investment horizon and found that up to a period of 17.5 years, a longer liability duration positively affects the illiquid asset allocation; after that, the positive correlation starts to decline.

The researchers attribute this to the liquidity and capital constraints to which pension funds are exposed.

The liquidity constraints on a pension fund consist of two components: short-run pension payments and collateral requirements on interest rate and currency derivatives.

As for capital constraints, defined benefit pension funds need to have sufficient capital to manage factors such as interest-rate risk, market risk, currency risk and longevity risk.

A pension fund’s liability duration shows the weighted average time to maturity of its pension payments. Having fewer short-term liabilities, as a fund would with a longer liability duration, creates opportunities to invest in illiquid assets.

Sponsored Content

However, a longer liability duration is also associated with a quadratic increase in interest-rate risk, which limits the opportunity to invest in illiquid assets, due to a higher capital requirement.

A pension fund can hedge risk exposures to reduce the capital requirement but hedging strategies using derivatives involve collateral requirements, which impose a liquidity constraint.

The authors also found other pension fund characteristics that affect investment policy. For example, size positively affects the allocation to illiquid assets. Also, corporate pension funds tend to invest less in illiquid assets than industry-wide and professional-group pension funds do.

To access the full paper click here

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

The arithmetic of “all-in” investment expenses

In the January/February issue of the Financial Analysts Journal, Jack Bogle, founder and former chief executive of the Vanguard Group, looks at the “all-in” investment expenses including not only expense ratios byt transaction costs, sales loads and cash drag. He highlights, in particular, how damaging these costs can be over the long run, and reaffirms

How to estimate the equity risk premium

Given the importance of equity risk premium, it is surprising how haphazard the estimation of equity risk premiums remains in practice. This paper by Aswath Damodaran at the New York University Stern School of Business examines a number of different approaches to determining the equity risk premium and why different approaches yield different values. It

Risk parity and beyond

This paper analyses whether the use of uncorrelated underlying risk factors, as opposed to correlated asset returns, can lead to a more efficient framework for measuring and managing portfolio diversification. The paper, by academics at EDHEC Business School and SYMMYS, acknowledges that the ability to construct well-diversified portfolios is a challenge of critical importance in

Emerging equity markets in a globalising world

Even though there has been dramatic globalisation over the past 20 years it still makes sense to segregate global equities into “developed” and “emerging” market buckets, according to a paper by Columbia and Duke academics. The research, which has important policy implications for institutional and pension fund management, shows that while correlations between developed and

Citigroup: a case study in managerial and regulatory failures

This article by Arthur Wilmarth from George Washington University Law School uses Citigroup as a case study to demonstrate the question of whether bank executives and regulators are able to supervise and control today’s complex megabanks. The study shows that post-mortem evaluations of Citigroup’s near-collapse revealed that neither Citigroup’s managers nor its regulators recognized the

Macroeconomic risk and hedge fund returns

This paper estimates hedge fund and mutual fund exposure to newly proposed measures of macroeconomic risk that are interpreted as measures of economic uncertainty. The academics, from Georgetown and Stern, find the resulting uncertainty betas explain a significant proportion of the cross-sectional dispersion in hedge fund returns. However, the same is not true for mutual

Previous