CIOs’ confidence wanes as agility becomes the focus

There is a plunge in confidence among CIOs that they will meet their return targets, with only 36 per cent of participants in the 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey expecting they will.

This is almost half the response from the previous year where 63 per cent of CIOs were confident in meeting their return targets.

The 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey, a global collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CaseyQuirk, part of Deloitte Consulting, finds asset owners keeping their allocations static but focusing on agility as they observe dramatic market changes not seen in a generation. And only 11 per cent are taking on additional risk to achieve return targets due to the uncertainty of markets.

With a majority lacking confidence that they will meet their return targets, respondents are re-evaluating their equity exposures, re-structuring their fixed income allocations and de-emphasising private markets.

While most investors were in a wait and see holding pattern regarding allocations The data found liquid equity exposures in a holding pattern, but 31 per cent said they are considering shifting their equities to more inflation-proof sectors.

They are also de-emphasising private markets and expecting write-downs to continue until at least the end of 2023.

Sponsored Content

Fixed-income allocations are also being re-structured due to fundamental changes in the rate environment, leading to a resurgence of high-quality active fixed income, and tactical increases in active emerging market debt to take advantage of high yields.

Chris Ailman, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, which is the second largest public pension fund in the United States, said fixed income allocations had shrunk in recent years but higher returns are now reversing that trend.

“Now that [fixed income] will have 4-6 per cent return, people will be putting in more money,” Ailman said. “It’s not a massive asset allocation change, the 80/20 portfolio was creeping to 85/15, and it will go back to 80/20. That return on cash and fixed income will help with overall returns.”

Internal management and external relationships

The ongoing shift towards internal investment continues, with 75 per cent of respondents saying they plan to decrease or retain the number of managers on their roster – a figure that is 8 per cent higher than in 2022.

Understaffed internal teams and a talent shortage are the top challenges impacting investment teams, cited by 58 per cent of respondents.

While asset owners have been working hard to build improved technology into their investment process, 57 per cent feel digital advancements have not significantly enhanced their manager due diligence process.

Not a single respondent is running a fully remote operation anymore, with 40 per cent requiring their employees to be in the office between 3-4 days a week, and 35 per cent requiring 1-2 days. Most of the remainder had relatively flexible policies, with only 6 per cent requiring employees to be in the office 5 days a week.

Only 20 per cent of respondents feel it is “important” or “very important” for asset management partners to require their investment teams to be in the office.

The survey asked CIOs extensive questions across their asset allocation, costs, ESG, manager relationships, operations and risk.

The full results can be found here.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Sovereign Development Funds: designing strategic investment institutions

The hunt for alpha is leading traditional investors toward more innovative strategies and operating models. And, significantly, one potential source of inspiration for long-term investors has come from an unconventional place: the community of sovereign development funds (SDFs). In this paper academics from Stanford University provide readers with analytical frameworks that can assist in the

Capitalising on institutional co-investment platforms

Co-investment is often perceived as referring to institutional investors investing alongside their external asset managers in companies, but increasingly it refers to investment responsibilities being shared among peer investors, as long-term institutional investors are forming co-investment partnerships with the specific objective of deploying capital collaboratively into attractive investment opportunities. These collaborative partnerships seem to be an

State pension funds tilt towards politically-connected stocks

It is well documented that local bias exists in US state pension fund holdings, but now an article in the Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming) finds evidence not only of local bias, but bias towards politically-connected stocks.  Not only that, but the article finds that political bias is detrimental to fund performance. “Political bias is

The power of knowledge management

Funds management is often discussed in the context of it being part art and part science, however most of the literature centres around the science, the finance, of funds management. The premise of active management is that skills and knowledge are paramount to capturing excess returns above the benchmark. But despite this premise, little is

Worldwide diversity in funded pension plans

There is a huge diversity in pension system design across the globe, reflecting historical, cultural and institutional diversity. There is much to be learned by each of the different systems, so in order to compare the benefits of various systems, two authors from APG in the Netherlands postulate a new classification of four role models

Re-intermediating investment management

In this paper, Ashby Monk and Rajiv Sharma from the Global Projects Center at Stanford University, examine the balance of power among the various parties in the private assets investment food chain. They argue that fund managers have too much power, as do the consultants that act as gatekeepers to those managers. While the authors

Previous