CIOs’ confidence wanes as agility becomes the focus

There is a plunge in confidence among CIOs that they will meet their return targets, with only 36 per cent of participants in the 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey expecting they will.

This is almost half the response from the previous year where 63 per cent of CIOs were confident in meeting their return targets.

The 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey, a global collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CaseyQuirk, part of Deloitte Consulting, finds asset owners keeping their allocations static but focusing on agility as they observe dramatic market changes not seen in a generation. And only 11 per cent are taking on additional risk to achieve return targets due to the uncertainty of markets.

With a majority lacking confidence that they will meet their return targets, respondents are re-evaluating their equity exposures, re-structuring their fixed income allocations and de-emphasising private markets.

While most investors were in a wait and see holding pattern regarding allocations The data found liquid equity exposures in a holding pattern, but 31 per cent said they are considering shifting their equities to more inflation-proof sectors.

They are also de-emphasising private markets and expecting write-downs to continue until at least the end of 2023.

Sponsored Content

Fixed-income allocations are also being re-structured due to fundamental changes in the rate environment, leading to a resurgence of high-quality active fixed income, and tactical increases in active emerging market debt to take advantage of high yields.

Chris Ailman, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, which is the second largest public pension fund in the United States, said fixed income allocations had shrunk in recent years but higher returns are now reversing that trend.

“Now that [fixed income] will have 4-6 per cent return, people will be putting in more money,” Ailman said. “It’s not a massive asset allocation change, the 80/20 portfolio was creeping to 85/15, and it will go back to 80/20. That return on cash and fixed income will help with overall returns.”

Internal management and external relationships

The ongoing shift towards internal investment continues, with 75 per cent of respondents saying they plan to decrease or retain the number of managers on their roster – a figure that is 8 per cent higher than in 2022.

Understaffed internal teams and a talent shortage are the top challenges impacting investment teams, cited by 58 per cent of respondents.

While asset owners have been working hard to build improved technology into their investment process, 57 per cent feel digital advancements have not significantly enhanced their manager due diligence process.

Not a single respondent is running a fully remote operation anymore, with 40 per cent requiring their employees to be in the office between 3-4 days a week, and 35 per cent requiring 1-2 days. Most of the remainder had relatively flexible policies, with only 6 per cent requiring employees to be in the office 5 days a week.

Only 20 per cent of respondents feel it is “important” or “very important” for asset management partners to require their investment teams to be in the office.

The survey asked CIOs extensive questions across their asset allocation, costs, ESG, manager relationships, operations and risk.

The full results can be found here.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

When should you choose an alternative to passive investing?

New research by Russell Investments’ co-chair of global investing, Don Ezra and senior lecturer at the Australian National University, Geoff Warren,  presents a framework for deciding when to choose an alternative to passively investing in capitalisation-weighted indices within any particular asset class, and highlights how the debate over active versus passive investing needs to be

Neuberger Berman alternatives strategy outlook

This paper from the Neuberger Berman fund of hedge funds team analyses the near-term prospects of distressed investing and volatility arbitrage, offers observations on the importance of managing the beta profiles of long and short positions within long/short equity portfolios, and explores the effects of reduced competition on hedge fund managers. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1

Collective investments for pension saving: lessons from Singapore’s CPF scheme

New research by the Pension Research Council at The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, examines whether workers seeking higher returns can expect to do better than the CPF-managed default, by moving their money into professionally-managed unit trusts. The evidence is mixed. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investing in climate change 2010

In this white paper by DB Climate Change Advisors, led by global head of climate change investment research Mark Fulton, the drivers of climate change for 2010 are examined in the context of strategic asset allocation. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What a difference a year makes

  A joint study by LIMRA , the International Foundation for Retirement Education and the Society of Actuaries into the effects of the financial crisis on how retired individuals with investable assets make decisions about investing their assets and purchasing financial products has found they are more risk averse and less confident post the crisis.

Pension risk under extreme scenarios: capturing tail risk in pension schemes

This research examines the effect of tail risk, or extreme risk, on pension funds, concluding that all extreme scenarios have an immediate negative impact that can significantly jeopardise the smooth functioning of a pension scheme, probably as much as the other non-extreme risks. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous