Culture, structure for the long term

Long-term investing has come into sharp focus as asset owners think hard about how best to fulfil their long-term goals and the advantages of being, and acting as, an investor with a long horizon.

In the latest paper I’ve co-authored with Geoff Warren, Ten Ideas to Foster Long-term Investing, we distil our previous work into 10 suggestions, 10 practical ideas, for entrenching a long-term mindset within an investment organisation.

Such a culture can support an unwavering focus on long-term objectives and a capacity for patience, while providing resistance to short-term performance pressures.

Our first paper, What Does It Mean to be a Long-term Investor?argues that long-term investors may be characterised by their latitude and their intent to pursue long-term goals. Ideally this should be supported by a capacity for patience, discretion over when to trade, and objectives and investment processes that are squarely focused on long-term outcomes.

Our second paper, “Organisational Design and Long-Term Investing, addresses aspects of organisational structure that can support the pursuit of long-term investment opportunities. It discusses four success drivers: investment beliefs, governance, aligned interests, and people.

Central to both papers is the concept that successful long-term investing requires embedding a long-term mindset deeply within an organisation.

Sponsored Content

The ideas are practical to implement and provide the biggest impact in focusing an organisation on the long term. Some of the key areas and actions are:

Ensure the focus is on long-term information, and jettisoning the wrong kind of information, to drive long-term outcomes.

Manage behavioural flaws that lead to groupthink, herding and a tendency to overreact to short-term losses.

Extend the evaluation horizon by rewarding the right behaviours for both internal and external managers.

Refocus measurement of performance and progress against objectives and away from historical results.

Slow down the decision cycle. It is often thought that information flow and related portfolio needs should be constantly monitored so as not to miss any opportunities and ensure best-positioning. However, such a constant flow of stimulus merely invites action and draws attention away from the long term. Consider reporting less often, holding fewer and more meaningful meetings and always have an option to do nothing on the table.

No one size fits all investment strategies or organisational structures. Remaining true to strategies and an organisational structure that are fit for purpose is essential to reap the benefits of a long-term approach.

Pay only for sustained performance. The industry standard is to award incentives on a yearly cycle based on performance. Merely awarding incentives over a longer history, say five years, can be problematic. Consider awarding incentives on an annual basis but make vesting conditioned upon sustained performance.

Hire people with an affinity for long-term investing. Easy to say but sometimes hard to do. Consider cultivating people by building a culture that provides a sense of importance and respect and hiring internally where possible to maintain this focus.

The paper provides many practical suggestions that can be used as a ready check list of areas and actions to help organisations embrace and engender a long-term focus.

David Iverson is head of asset allocation at New Zealand Super. Geoff Warren is associate professor of the Australian National University.

Leave a Comment

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

The $273 billion New York State Common has upped the pressure on portfolio companies to report on how artificial intelligence usage is contributing to layoffs, as AI governance becomes a growing focus in the proxy voting and engagement activities of asset owners.

Sort content by

NBIM transparently explains half year results

The semi annual report of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is testament to its commitment to transparency, unambiguously outlining the half year results which came in 0.04% under benchmark. The fund did benefit from a nearly 15% exposure to tech stocks, but was let down by returns in renewable energy infrastructure.

AP funds face consolidation as report flags scale and efficiency wins

A long-awaited review into Sweden's buffer funds suggests consolidation between the three Stockholm funds – AP1, AP3 and AP4 – stating that the advantages in terms of efficiency and scale outweigh the disadvantages of continued separation.

Same same, but different: Governance lessons from three markets

Despite global pension markets’ varying levels of maturity, the goal of combining portfolio resilience with meeting fund objectives is the same, and it can be achieved through different manifestations of governance structures.

Solid foundations allow Canadian funds to innovate and grow

The foundations of the modern Canadian pension fund industry were laid decades ago, and organisations today continue to reap the benefits. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard that the potential of the industry is immense, built on solid principles and an embrace of new technology and processes.

Pioneers of the Canadian model say its principles are under siege

A founding principle of the Canadian pension system is under attack. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard from four individuals who have been instrumental in making the system what it is today, and that the sound principles that made the system great need to be defended.

CalPERS mulls tying climate KPIs to incentive pay

CalPERS may tie the incentive pay of its staff to meeting climate KPIs in the near future. The fund's executive pay consultants also discussed other ways the fund should tweak incentive pay like adding an asset class investment performance weighting to the annual incentive formula.

Previous