Opportunity in the making

Should investors start to consider the emergent opportunities in high yield and distressed debt? We think so. The market stress that arose in late 2015 resulted in a significant widening in credit spreads as price moves were exacerbated by severely reduced liquidity.

As the credit cycle continues to mature, we believe that stressed and distressed credit (especially in the US) could offer investors a rare opportunity to generate attractive returns in today’s low (or negative!) yield environment.

Fundamental and technical headwinds

Much of the poor performance of corporate credit in recent years has been due to losses in energy and commodity-related issuers, as weaker worldwide demand and excess supply sent oil and commodity prices down.

The other big problem has been reduced liquidity, as tighter regulations have discouraged banks from holding credit. Without the banks, there were often no willing buyers, spreads widened and the absolute price of many corporate credit securities plunged. This, in turn, exacerbated volatility, leading to dramatic swings in prices.

 

Sponsored Content

Number of US HY Bonds experiencing more than a 10 per cent price loss in a month
graph01_opt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit fundamentals have also shown signs of deterioration as 2015 company earnings reports came in weaker alongside rising debt levels.

The low default rates of around 1 per cent to 2 per cent in recent years may be due to low interest rates masking the weakness of many company balance sheets. In this environment, idiosyncratic risk is heightened and dispersion in performance at the security level more likely.

The proportion of corporate credit trading at distressed prices now surpasses the levels set in 2011. The illiquidity in credit markets has had a disproportionate effect on lower-rated credits which have significantly underperformed higher-rated credits. The ratio of spreads on global CCC-rated debt to B-rated debt (a measure of stress in credit markets) has become wider than at the worst point in 2008.

Many macro risks are likely to persist, and the stability of capital markets depends on effective management by central banks. Geopolitical risks abound and China’s gradual slowdown will continue to place pressure on emerging markets. Default rates will eventually rise and volatility is unlikely to abate.

The opportunity for investors

It is often at the darkest hour that opportunities present themselves. We therefore believe that it is now time to consider how to take advantage of the structural changes and dislocations arising in credit markets.

Having highlighted many of the negatives in the current environment, it is worth noting that we believe we are unlikely to be in a 2008-style scenario.

Leverage is manageable and although some industries are stressed, it is likely that access to capital will remain relatively accommodative.

Federal Reserve policy along with easier underwriting may extend the cycle and postpone the uptick in defaults. It is now, more than ever, a “market of credits” rather than a “credit market”, affording those with rigorous research coupled with patience, capital and flexibility the potential to generate attractive returns.

Any further deterioration in economic conditions, combined with rising default rates as the credit cycle matures, could create significant opportunities for investors willing to tolerate a degree of volatility and illiquidity.

While investors will need to take into account their own specific return objectives, liquidity constraints, time horizon and risk tolerance, options worth considering include:

  • Long-only credit opportunities funds. These strategies could be thought of as sitting further up the risk–return spectrum and with less liquidity than traditional multi-asset credit funds.
  • Credit-oriented hedge funds. These strategies would have the flexibility to invest both long and short and will rely to a greater extent on manager skill than market beta when compared with long-only credit opportunities funds.
  • Private markets vehicles. These typically focus on opportunities at the higher end of the risk–return spectrum and tend to offer the least liquidity to the end investor.

While the opportunity may not yet be upon us, investors would do well to heed the military maxim that “time spent in reconnaissance is seldom wasted”.

 

Phil Edwards, European director of strategic research, and Diane Miller, senior manager researcher, Mercer

 

Leave a Comment

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

Canada's HOOPP has officially adopted the total portfolio approach since the start of 2026. Unpacking the move, the fund's managing director and head of total portfolio group Jacky Lee writes that while the approach doesn't magically make the return better, the fact that it frees the investment team from outdated processes and gives investment leaders the flexibility to act is what gives it an edge.

Sort content by

The investment model for asset owners: is there a best-practice version?

In the last of a series of articles exclusively for conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Roger Urwin, head of global content at Towers Watson examines the asset owner investment models that are recognised as best practice, questioning whether there are patterns to the models of success. The best-practice investing model could either involve how you do it or what

PFZW reformulates investment principles

PFZW, the €150 billion ($205 billion) Dutch pension fund for the health care industry, has created a new investment framework which is the result of an 18-month soul-searching journey under a project called “The White Sheet of Paper”. The framework will translate into policy and implementation steps starting from 2015. Jaap van Dam, PGGM´s chief

Risk parity – the benefits of a conditional approach

Risk parity is a meaningful and robust approach for building well-diversified portfolios, but it relies on historical volatility estimates, which penalises upside risk as well as downside risk and leads to a massive overweighting of bonds versus equities, even in a low yield environment. The authors from EDHEC Risk-Institute build the case for an alternative

The in-house investment team: right people, roles, rewards

Good people are at the core of any successful organisation, and that is true for asset owners. Global chief investment officer of Towers Watson, Craig Baker discusses how designing and implementing structures that attract the right people in the right roles can unlock long-term sustainable advantages that the right investment team can offer.   It

Ubiquitous and adaptive investing – the aspiration of a truly global fund

Large pension funds might be invested on a truly global basis but their operating models are rarely global structures. Towers Watson argues that asset owners can benefit from a business model that can deliver organisational performance, manages talent and aligns with core missions from multiple operating locations. Over the last decade, large pension funds and

Evolution in risk reporting for sophisticated institutional investors

Risk reporting is increasingly regarded by sophisticated investors as an important ingredient in their decision-making process, authors from EDHEC argue that  the effective number of (uncorrelated) bets could be a useful risk indicator to be added to risk reports for equity and policy portfolios. Risk reporting is increasingly regarded by sophisticated investors as an important

Previous