Opportunity in the making

Should investors start to consider the emergent opportunities in high yield and distressed debt? We think so. The market stress that arose in late 2015 resulted in a significant widening in credit spreads as price moves were exacerbated by severely reduced liquidity.

As the credit cycle continues to mature, we believe that stressed and distressed credit (especially in the US) could offer investors a rare opportunity to generate attractive returns in today’s low (or negative!) yield environment.

Fundamental and technical headwinds

Much of the poor performance of corporate credit in recent years has been due to losses in energy and commodity-related issuers, as weaker worldwide demand and excess supply sent oil and commodity prices down.

The other big problem has been reduced liquidity, as tighter regulations have discouraged banks from holding credit. Without the banks, there were often no willing buyers, spreads widened and the absolute price of many corporate credit securities plunged. This, in turn, exacerbated volatility, leading to dramatic swings in prices.

 

Sponsored Content

Number of US HY Bonds experiencing more than a 10 per cent price loss in a month
graph01_opt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit fundamentals have also shown signs of deterioration as 2015 company earnings reports came in weaker alongside rising debt levels.

The low default rates of around 1 per cent to 2 per cent in recent years may be due to low interest rates masking the weakness of many company balance sheets. In this environment, idiosyncratic risk is heightened and dispersion in performance at the security level more likely.

The proportion of corporate credit trading at distressed prices now surpasses the levels set in 2011. The illiquidity in credit markets has had a disproportionate effect on lower-rated credits which have significantly underperformed higher-rated credits. The ratio of spreads on global CCC-rated debt to B-rated debt (a measure of stress in credit markets) has become wider than at the worst point in 2008.

Many macro risks are likely to persist, and the stability of capital markets depends on effective management by central banks. Geopolitical risks abound and China’s gradual slowdown will continue to place pressure on emerging markets. Default rates will eventually rise and volatility is unlikely to abate.

The opportunity for investors

It is often at the darkest hour that opportunities present themselves. We therefore believe that it is now time to consider how to take advantage of the structural changes and dislocations arising in credit markets.

Having highlighted many of the negatives in the current environment, it is worth noting that we believe we are unlikely to be in a 2008-style scenario.

Leverage is manageable and although some industries are stressed, it is likely that access to capital will remain relatively accommodative.

Federal Reserve policy along with easier underwriting may extend the cycle and postpone the uptick in defaults. It is now, more than ever, a “market of credits” rather than a “credit market”, affording those with rigorous research coupled with patience, capital and flexibility the potential to generate attractive returns.

Any further deterioration in economic conditions, combined with rising default rates as the credit cycle matures, could create significant opportunities for investors willing to tolerate a degree of volatility and illiquidity.

While investors will need to take into account their own specific return objectives, liquidity constraints, time horizon and risk tolerance, options worth considering include:

  • Long-only credit opportunities funds. These strategies could be thought of as sitting further up the risk–return spectrum and with less liquidity than traditional multi-asset credit funds.
  • Credit-oriented hedge funds. These strategies would have the flexibility to invest both long and short and will rely to a greater extent on manager skill than market beta when compared with long-only credit opportunities funds.
  • Private markets vehicles. These typically focus on opportunities at the higher end of the risk–return spectrum and tend to offer the least liquidity to the end investor.

While the opportunity may not yet be upon us, investors would do well to heed the military maxim that “time spent in reconnaissance is seldom wasted”.

 

Phil Edwards, European director of strategic research, and Diane Miller, senior manager researcher, Mercer

 

Leave a Comment

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

Canada's HOOPP has officially adopted the total portfolio approach since the start of 2026. Unpacking the move, the fund's managing director and head of total portfolio group Jacky Lee writes that while the approach doesn't magically make the return better, the fact that it frees the investment team from outdated processes and gives investment leaders the flexibility to act is what gives it an edge.

Sort content by

The efficiency trap

Will the relentless pursuit of efficiency undermine our ability to build a resilient and sustainable future? Andrea Caloisi, a researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute at WTW, explores how complex systems, driven by short-term optimisation, may be fuelling long-term fragility.

Data ‘slop’ and disinformation emerge as systemic risks for investors

Will AI-fuelled misinformation overwhelm investors’ ability to make sound decisions? The Thinking Ahead Institute’s Tim Hodgson examines the systemic risks of 'data slop' and why data provenance should be a strategic priority.

Asset managers can’t have it both ways on sustainability

Asset managers have recently been trying to show that they could cater to all sides, from asset owners that have spent years integrating sustainability into their investment strategies to anti-ESG elected officials in states like Texas. But Hugues Létourneau writes that they can't have it all.

Why investors must engage on the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance

Will antimicrobial resistance derail decades of medical and economic progress, or can coordinated action avert a global crisis? Anastassia Johnson, researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute, examines the growing threat of drug-resistant infections and the role investors can play in driving sustainable solutions.

Reconciling ethics and returns in pursuit of a sustainable economy

Can investors and governments balance financial returns with social equity, or will short-term gains prevail? Anastassia Johnson, researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute, tackles the complex debate about what makes a just transition.

Why adaptation alone won’t solve the climate change conundrum

Is a narrowly defined transition likely to fail? The Thinking Ahead Institute’s climate transition working group has been exploring this thesis, writes the Institute’s co-founder Tim Hodgson.

Previous