Is LDI fit for purpose?

In 2007, the C$94 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) moved to a liability-driven investing approach, which included a large allocation to bonds and a lot of internal investment management. The approach helped the fund survive the global financial crisis and has served it well for the past 13 years. But now – with the COVID crisis and a very low interest rate environment – that approach is being revisited and the fund is looking to invest more in alpha generating assets.

“In 2007 we shifted to a liability driven approach and had a major allocation to long-term bonds which served us well through the GFC,” says Jeff Wendling, who joined the fund in 1998 and became CEO in April this year.

“Over all those years it also limited the volatility of our surplus, and did a good job of having our assets match our liabilities. That has worked out well through the 13 or so years, but now yields are very low so we are asking two things: does the liability driven strategy still make sense? And how do we build a portfolio that will generate the returns to keep HOOPP fully funded over the long term. Bonds won’t do that for us the same way they have in the past.”

The evolution of this liability-driven investment approach (known as LDI 2.0) is the exploration of what to invest in when interest rates are so low. Wendling says there is no doubt the fund will hold less bonds than it has in the past. In 2009 the fund moved from a traditional 60:40 equities/bond mix to a split of roughly 45:55 and it’s been there ever since.

“We are going to hold fewer bonds in the future. They provide minimal returns right now and also less risk mitigation benefits to the growth in our liabilities,” Wendling says. “Bonds helped us in 2008/09 during the GFC but I don’t think they will act so well if we have difficult markets going forward, so we will hold less bonds.”

Instead the fund is looking to invest in more return seeking assets – in particular increasing allocations to equities, real estate and infrastructure, which the fund is relatively late to compared with its Canadian peers.

Sponsored Content

“We will invest in more bond-like assets with higher returns such as high dividend-yielding equities. We are also looking for more alpha-generating, uncorrelated sources of return through either internal or external management, and more international diversification. All of that, we think, will help generate returns that we are not getting from our bond holdings.”

The fund started 2020 in a strong position having returned 17 per cent last year, and did buy risky assets in March and April, adding to equities, credit and provincial bond positions pushing assets to an all-time high of C$100 billion.

HOOPP launched its infrastructure program in 2019, coming late to the asset class by Canadian standards. The substantial bond holdings had served that role, but now with bonds decreasing, infrastructure is getting a look in.

The fund is managing its C$1 billion commitments to infrastructure through an internal team and is looking for some select relationships.

“This is a key asset that we think will replace some of those bonds that just aren’t yielding us the returns that we need right now,” Wendling says. “It’s going to be an important part of our assets.”

Overall in private assets HOOPP has a 25 per cent allocation, compared with some of its Canadian peers which have half their assets in private investments, so there is room to grow in private equity and real estate too.

“Those assets also have some of the hedging characteristics we look to hedge liabilities and inflation hedging aspects as well,” he says.

In terms of ongoing risk, inflation has always been something the fund has considered in a meaningful way.

The HOOPP pension benefit is based on employees’ best five years of earnings so if there is wage inflation the fund’s liabilities increase.

“We do want to look at having assets that can perform well in a higher inflationary environment. In our stress testing approach we do test severe shocks including inflation shocks,” Wendling says. “It’s a tough question at the moment and we’ve never had wider range of views on it. Inflation right now has been very well behaved and under shot what policy makers were looking for. We think it will remain pretty well behaved but the reflationary measures of policymakers will mean it will definitely lead to higher inflation, that will happen in the longer term. In a nearer time frame we think it will behave the same way it has in the past couple of years.”

HOOPP has used derivatives for a long time as a way of mitigating risks, including tail risks, but also as a way of getting its equities exposures.

By investing in derivatives it allows the capital to be invested in long-term bonds for example, Wendling says.

“Derivatives as an approach is a key part of our long-term success and will continue to be so,” he says. “We have always been very strong risk managers. The fund is getting larger, more complex and more international and we need to be constantly improving and working out our risk management capabilities.

HOOPP was one of the very early funds to go to internal investment management and move away from external management, and in a sign that the fund is looking at all aspects of the way it invests, that is now under review too.

“That has served us well and where we did use external managers it was generally in private equity. As we go forward I think trying to generate the returns we need we will be looking at new strategies, new absolute return strategies for example and will use external managers where we can in a selective way to find more diversified sources of return. We will still be largely internally managed but not as much as it has been in the past.”

Leave a Comment

NZ Super cuts benchmark return expectation on US valuation concerns

NZ Super cuts benchmark return expectation on US valuation concerns

A view that the US stock market is overvalued and equity risk premia will be lower over the long term has driven New Zealand Super to lower the return expectations for its reference portfolio following its recent five-yearly review of the benchmark. Co-chief investment officer Brad Dunstan also flags underweight commodity exposure as an area to address and explains why the fund remains sceptical of illiquidity premia despite seeing a growing case for private markets.

Sort content by

Wisdom: The jewel in the dirt-pile of intelligence

In his regular column for Top1000funds.com, Tim Hodgson, co-founder of the Thinking Ahead Institute at WTW, reflects on the dangers of unconstrained action, the limits of efficiency, and why long-term sustainability may depend on knowing when not to act.

When states lose the ability to govern, populism rises

Stephen Kotkin, global geopolitical expert and Stanford academic, has warned that there is an “increasing governability challenge in high-income democracies” where government departments face declining capacity to perform core functions due to complex regulatory systems and bureaucratic tasks. 

Inside NBIM’s AI playbook to hone investment edge

Norges Bank is a lean organisation despite managing a $2.2 trillion portfolio. Across the fund’s four global offices, there are only 700 staff, or $3 billion per person, which is why it has made pursuing AI-driven efficiency a core organisation initiative – and a non-negotiable requirement for its employees. 

Investors unpack regime-based portfolio thinking 

Funds are operating in an extraordinary environment, with Scott Chan, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, saying he has never witnessed so many “large shifts stacked on top of the other” in his investment career. Amid the change, investors are increasingly shifting to a scenario and regime-based asset allocation.  

AI investors face post-Moore’s Law reality

Mark Horowitz, a leading computer scientist and electrical engineer at Stanford University, has declared that Moore’s Law is “basically over”, which will have significant ramifications for artificial intelligence investors who are counting on more computing power to feed into more complex models.  

Public-private partnerships key to fixing US infrastructure

The size of the current infrastructure investment gap and the speed at which it is widening mean there is both a desire and a need for more public-private partnerships to unlock funding. Investors say that collaboration with local governments and raising public awareness of private investment benefits are crucial. 

Previous