Equity bias thwarts Irish sovereign fund’s returns

Ireland’s €15.5 billion (US$20.6 billion) sovereign wealth fund, the National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF), has been highly exposed to the equity market malaise. Kristen Paech examines the fund’s investment strategy and the Government’s recent decision to use the NPRF to finance the recapitalisation of two of Ireland’s
beleaguered banks.

Irish pension funds have suffered heavy losses as a result of their large allocations to equities, and the €15.5 billion (US$20.6 billion) National Pensions Reserve Fund (NPRF is no exception.

The fund, which was established in April 2001 to meet the costs of Ireland’s social welfare and public service pensions from 2025, blamed its first quarter decline of -6.7 per cent on the performance of its equity portfolio.

The equity portfolio accounts for around 57 per cent – or €8.8 billion – of the total portfolio.

During 2008, the NPRF lost more than 30 per cent of its value, and since inception in 2001, its annualised performance has fallen into negative territory, with the return sitting at -0.4 per cent compared with 6 per cent at the end of 2007.

Sponsored Content

For some years now, Irish pension funds have been slowly diversifying away from their home country bias, reducing their allocations to Irish equities.

According to Mercer’s annual European Asset Allocation Survey, the credit crisis appears to have hastened this trend, with Irish pension fund allocations to equities falling dramatically during 2008, from 67 to 60 per cent.

The Irish Association of Pension Funds (IAPF) put the portion of Irish equities within pension portfolios at just 3.5 per cent of total assets, down from 8.2 per cent at the end of 2007 and 12.4 per cent at the end of 2003.

The NPRF is likewise significantly underweight its benchmark equity holding, although its strategic target of 66 per cent at the end of 2009 suggests the fund will look to rebalance upwards throughout the course of the year.

Since the start of the credit crisis in 2007, the fund has been taking steps to protect its portfolio, directing more into cash and maintaining a “cautious” approach towards equity investment.

The investment strategy is focused on building up a diversified portfolio of equities and other real assets on the basis that real assets will outperform financial assets such as bonds over the fund’s long investment horizon.

While the fund admits that this strategy means it will suffer volatility over certain short-term periods, ultimately its performance will be determined by the long-term growth of the global economy over a 25 to 30 year period, rather than by sharp market movements in response to extreme events.

However, recently the fund was forced to invest outside of its statutory investment policy under direction from the Ministry of Finance, after the Government called on the NPRF to fund the €7 billion recapitalisation of two of Ireland’s
beleaguered banks – Allied Irish Bank and Bank of Ireland.

The move caused the NPRF to reduce its cash balances, which comprised more than 10 per cent of the total fund at the start of 2009, and liquidate its government bond investments to finance the €3.5 billion purchase of Bank of Ireland preference shares needed to recapitalise the bank.

The remainder of the funding will be provided by means of a frontloading of the Exchequer contributions for 2009 and 2010.

A fixed dividend of 8 per cent per annum is payable on the preference shares, which can be repurchased at par up to the fifth anniversary of issue and at 125 per cent of face value thereafter.

Warrants attached to the preference shares give an option to purchase up to 25 per cent of the ordinary share capital of the bank existing on the date of issue of the preference shares. All proceeds from the preference shares will form part of the fund.

Most of the management of the NPRF’s investment mandates are outsourced to specialist managers; however certain mandates are managed internally by the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA), which acts as the
manager of the fund.

The NTMA manages the fund’s passive bond allocation, its unallocated cash, and the centralised currency overlay program, under which 50 per cent of its foreign currency exposure is hedged.

The manager line up is as follows:

Passive equity

Barclays Global Investors

Bank of Ireland Asset Management/State Street Global Advisors

Index plus funds

 

US large cap – AIG Global Investment Group

 

US large cap – Barclays Global Investors

Active equity

Pan Europe – Oechsle International Advisors

Pan Europe – Putnam Investment

Global – RCM

Global – Generation Investment Management

North American Growth – Goldman Sachs Asset Management International

North American Value – Lord, Abbett & Co

North American Enhanced Index – Invesco Asset Management

 

Japan – Daiwa SB Investments

 

Pacific Basin – Schroder Investment Management

EAFE Small cap – Acadian Asset Management

EAFE Small cap – Axa Rosenberg Investment Management

Global emerging markets – Alliance Bernstein*

Global emerging markets – Emerging Markets Management*

Global emerging markets – Batterymarch Financial Management

Global emerging markets – Pioneer Investment Management

Global emerging markets – Principal Global Investors (Europe)

*Pooled investment vehicle

Bonds

Eurozone government – National Treasury Management Agency

Active Eurozone government – Irish Life Investment Managers

Active Eurozone corporate – Deutsche Asset Management

Currency

Passive – National Treasury Management Agency

Active funds

Goldman Sachs Asset Management*

JP Morgan Asset Management*

*Pooled investment vehicle

 

Global tactical asset allocation

 

Bridgewater Associates

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Danica maneuvers towards infrastructure

Danish pension provider Danica is upping the alternatives portion in its roughly $57-billion portfolio as it looks to boost returns within the country’s strict solvency framework. Alternatives already make up over 4 per cent of the $33-billion Traditional Fund, Danica’s largest and most conventional pension pool, double the proportion the asset class took at the

Billion-dollar beef-up at Barclays’ OPAM

If Tony Broccardo, head of Oak Pensions Asset Management, the investment arm of the £23-billion ($35.6-billion) pension fund for employees of London-headquartered bank, Barclays, wasn’t a fund manager he would have been an architect. But Broccardo has applied similar skills of stress testing, planning and making something structurally secure to the return-seeking fund, one of

Dutch fund bolsters bonds, chills on bricks

Things are suddenly looking cheerful again in the world of Dutch pensions. The country’s famous tulip fields might not be set to bloom until April, but investors already have a harvest to delight at from a good year of investing. For instance, Hans de Ruiter, chief investment officer of the €2.5-billion ($3.36-billion) TNO pension fund

How is the Tesco fund faring aged one?

According to the latest figures, an ambitious turnaround plan at the United Kingdom’s biggest supermarket chain, Tesco, has helped reverse falling profits. Last year the retailer, one of Britain’s largest private sector employers and a landmark in every town since founder Jack Cohen opened his first store in North London in 1929, also changed strategy

Finnish fund diversifies out of Europe

Over the past five years, Finland’s 5.4 million people have watched with alarm as the eurozone they joined as founder members has descended into financial turmoil. So it is no surprise that Keva, which manages €34.4 billion ($47.1 billion) on behalf of Finland’s municipalities, as well as administering state and Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland

Vita Sammelstiftung puts bond holdings under microscope

Samuel Lisse, chief executive of Switzerland’s Vita Sammelstiftung (Vita), is currently in the process of hiring a new head of investment. The new appointee will have plenty resting in the in-tray, it appears, as she starts to assist the investment committee that governs the strategy of the 8.5-billion-Swiss-franc ($9.1-billion) joint foundation. That is not because

Previous