Canadian funds shine in transparency benchmark

For the fourth year running, Canada is number one in the country rankings of the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark, according to the 2024 results. Each of the five Canadian funds in the benchmark are ranked in the top 11 funds globally.

Not only was Canada nine points clear of the second-placed Australia, but it had the narrowest margin between its top- and bottom-ranked funds (scores ranging from 87 to 96).

Canada dominated in transparency of disclosures in governance, performance and responsible investment, taking top spot in all three; while The Netherlands took out the top spot in cost disclosures.

While Canadian funds score well across all four factors, they are particularly strong in governance. Three of the five funds that earned a perfect score on the governance factor are Canadian and all Canadian funds scored 97 or higher.

“Strong, independent governance is perhaps the most important element of the Canadian model,” according to Edsart Heuberger, CEM Benchmarking’s product lead for transparency benchmarking.

“Clearly, transparency on governance matters to them, too.”

Sponsored Content

Heurberger says for leading funds, the GPTB methodology has become a roadmap for improving transparency.

“These funds have addressed the gaps in their score. Governance, as an example, is an area where funds typically own all the data that is required to achieve a score of 100 – they just need to disclose.”

Australia ranked second in the country scores this year, moving up from fourth four years ago, when the benchmark was launched.

The Netherlands ranks third, and the Dutch funds continue to provide the best public disclosures on costs.

Heurberger also acknowledged the Nordic funds, which continue to improve transparency scores on the back of great responsible investing reporting.

The GPTB, a collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking, measures the transparency of disclosures across cost, governance, performance and responsible investment for 75 funds across 15 countries, with the aim of improving industry transparency.

The fourth edition of the GPTB reveals again that increased scrutiny on public disclosures is driving measurable improvements. Last year, 77 per cent of the reviewed organisations improved their total transparency scores. This year 69 per cent of funds scored higher.

In 2024, the average fund scored 63 out of 100, versus 60 last year, and 55 in 2022. The funds at the top of the rankings continue to improve the most.

For the second year running, the Government Pension Fund Global topped the list of the most transparent funds, narrowly beating CPP Investments. [See Norway takes out top spot on transparency, with a perfect score]

This year, the survey was updated with three goals in mind: removing or improving overly interpretative questions; keeping the responsible investment survey current; and keeping the cost disclosure requirements consistent with reporting best practice as set out by CEM’s Global Reporting Principles. The change in methodology hasn’t materially impacted fund or country rankings. [See the full questionnaire here]

Leave a Comment

CPP Investments, NBIM reflect on lessons from a 5-year transparency journey

CPP Investments, NBIM reflect on lessons from a 5-year transparency journey

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark has been a driving force in improved transparency of disclosures and reporting among global asset owners. As the project comes to its close after five years, two leading funds reflect on why transparency has been a clear focus for their organisations. 

Sort content by

GPTB highlights transparency gaps

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark has revealed the need for serious improvement in pension transparency across the globe.

Benchmark will help build trust

Transparency is an important link in improving pension delivery, and the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark will help lift transparency standards and ultimately trust in pension institutions, according to its advisory board.

Pension transparency needs a benchmark

A new Global Pension Transparency Benchmark – the first formal collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking - will launch in February 2021 ranking countries, via their underlying pension funds, on four factors: governance and organization; performance; costs; and responsible investing.

Asset owners report half of all costs

Asset owners are reporting only half of their true total costs according to analysis by CEM Benchmarking exclusively for Top1000funds.com. This means tens of billions of dollars across the industry is not being reported. The authors look at case studies and make suggestions for industry best practice.

Canadians more complex than first glance

The Canadian model, revered world over for its supreme pension management, is not low cost despite that being one of its oft-described traits. New research by CEM Benchmarking and McGill University shows that these funds are cost efficient, rather than being low cost. Their aim is to be high net performers, not low cost.

What past market crashes teach us

Looking back at the portfolios of large institutional investors during and after the dot.com crash and the GFC, CEM Benchmarking, reveals commonality in the portfolios that thrived. For both events the top quartile returns were more than 2 per cent higher than the bottom quartile. Analysing the asset allocation and behaviour of investors showed two clear themes: top quartile performers had more defensive allocations pre-crash; and rebalancing is a tailwind for performance.