Perfect score sees Norway take out top spot on transparency

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, Government Pension Fund Global, has topped the list of the most transparent funds according to the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark’s 2024 findings, scoring a perfect 100 out of 100.

In the four years the GPTB has been measuring transparency of global funds, the Government Pension Fund Global has improved its score by 27 points from 73 in 2020 to 100 in 2024.

Executive leadership at the Government Pension Fund Global have put transparency front and centre over the past few years and the improvements in the score reflect that dedication. [See Why transparency is strategic initiative for Norway’s SWF]

The GPTB, a collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking aimed at measuring the transparency of disclosures across cost, governance, performance and responsible investment in a bid to improve the industry transparency, asks binary questions: does a fund disclose something, or not.

Edsart Heuberger, CEM Benchmarking’s product lead for transparency benchmarking, says the GPTB measures the completeness of the disclosure, but not necessarily the quality.

“Mind you, in our experience, the leading funds clearly have higher quality disclosures, and the Government Pension Fund Global has best-in-class reporting. Their materials are a joy to read,” he says.

Sponsored Content

“Addressing gaps in reporting isn’t always trivial. In some cases, the data needs to be sourced internally or by third parties. We understand the Government Pension Fund Global had to lobby the Ministry of Finance this year to provide more transparency on governance to achieve their new score.”

Like last year, CPP Investments was ranked second, only narrowly beaten by Government Pension Fund Global. CPP Investments, which topped the benchmark in the first and second editions, improved its score from 88 last year to 96 in 2024.

CalPERS was in third spot this year, jumping from fourth in 2023 and displacing AustralianSuper, which slipped to equal seventh.

This year the top 10 funds globally were particularly competitive, with an average score improvement of 10 points. So, while AustralianSuper scored two points higher than it did last year, it was leapfrogged by others with greater improvements.

The fourth edition of the GPTB again reveals that increased scrutiny on public disclosures is driving measurable transparency improvements. Last year, 77 per cent of the reviewed organisations improved their total transparency scores, while this year 69 per cent of funds scored higher.

In 2024, the average fund scored 63 out of 100, versus 60 last year, and 55 in 2022. The funds at the top of the rankings continue to improve the most.

This year 19 funds scored over 80, compared to nine last year, and six scored over 90. Further, nine of the top 10 most-transparent funds scored the same or higher than the most-transparent fund last year.

“For leading funds, the GPTB methodology has become a roadmap for improving transparency. These funds have addressed the gaps in their score,” Heuberger says.

But while there have been huge improvements in transparency at the top end of the fund rankings, there remains a big gap between the leaders and the laggards. The lowest-ranked fund scored only 14 overall.

“Surprisingly, we continue to see few improvements from funds that were laggards in the first edition of this benchmark,” Heuberger says.

“The laggards then are still the laggards now. The gap between the best and the laggard funds is increasing, which is unusual for most benchmarks.”

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

London’s CIV talks pooling progress

The coronavirus is an unprecedented test for the UK’s eight Local Government Pension Scheme asset pools. The London Collective Investment Vehicle, the pooling manager for the pension assets of London’s 32 boroughs has lost 15 per cent of the value of its portfolio for the month, and CEO Mike O’Donnell says ensuring liquidity and diversification are priorities in the months ahead.

Long-term disclosure post COVID-19

In times of uncertainty and disruption the “long-term” is a place that’s often easy to talk about but harder to operationalise but forward-looking information is highly valued, particularly during this crisis. To understand a company’s value proposition requires a real sense of its ability to innovate and be a source of disruption (not its victim). That requires a rounded view of the forward story and an assessment of key ESG issues and mega-trends.

Wisconsin leans into opportunities

In the space of three months the State of Wisconsin Investment Board has moved its portfolio from “defensive” to “offensive” as it “leans into the opportunities” presented by the coronavirus crisis. CIO and executive director David Villa, and deputy, Rochelle Klaskin spoke to Amanda White about the portfolio and how the large internal team is managing remotely.

Korean fund faces unique challenge

The KRW14.3 trillion ($12 billion) Korea Public Officials Benefit Association is sitting on more than 10 per cent cash, but in a unique challenge due to the coronavirus crisis, it is having trouble deploying capital. Amanda White spoke to CIO, Dong Hun Jang, about the options including listed alternatives and distressed opportunities.

Risk management in a time of crisis

Markets in disarray are where long-term investors make money. Investors that perform the best over the long term will have taken calculated and deliberate risks and put money to work during crises like this one. But how? Focusing Capital on the Long Term CEO and research director discuss.

Enormity of climate crisis misunderstood

There is a lack of understanding in investment decision-making about how big the climate crisis is which could lead to investments and risks being mis-directed, according to Professor Cameron Hepburn, Professor of Environmental Economics at Oxford University.

Previous