TCFD disclosures are not hitting the mark

In June, G7 nations endorsed mandatory climate-related financial disclosures based on the Taskforce for Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework recommendations. A recent report identified that only 23 per cent of Canadian listed companies are reporting in alignment with those recommendations, exposing its public entities to the risk of diminishing their access to capital while limiting investors’ access to their returns.

Although late in 2020 Canada’s largest pension funds made news by publicly declaring that they wish to see issuers disclose to both the SASB and TCFD frameworks, of the 228 companies listed on Canada’s S&P/TSX Composite Index only 23 per cent provided a clear statement indicating that their climate reporting align with the TCFD recommendations, with an additional 14 per cent expressing a desire to align with those recommendations and 54 per cent with no mention at all.  Although, the extractives and minerals processing and the financials sectors led the way in terms of TCFD-aligned reporting, the study discovered that there were no TCFD-aligned reports found in the healthcare, renewable energy resources & alternative energy, and services sectors.

And how are investors responding to this lack of climate reporting?

To get a pulse, Canadian ESG Advisory firm Millani Inc. focused its recent Semi-Annual Institutional Investor ESG Sentiment Study on climate reporting, and more specifically, on investors’ expectations for issuers disclosures to the TCFD framework*.

The study concluded that the Canadian investment community is mindful of the challenges of reporting in line with the TCFD, with most respondents suggesting that issuers start their reporting now but to consider that ­reporting will need to be iterative and progressive going forward.  However, regulators and investors are expected to become less forgiving with time.

Sponsored Content

Regarding emissions disclosures, 100 per cent of investors surveyed said they are assessing scope 1 & 2 and 75 per cent are looking to assess scope 3. Meanwhile, 90 per cent of those issuers who have TCFD-aligned reports, provide scope 1 and 2 emissions, and 50 per cent report scope 3 emissions.  Much of this sentiment aligns with the proxy voting trends that the market witnessed in 2021, with multiple shareholder resolutions asking for climate strategies or disclosures to scope 3, surprisingly getting mainstream investor support.

But the study also highlighted those investors find that TCFD disclosures are less insightful than most had anticipated. Given that issuers can choose which climate scenarios they can use, investors expressed that companies are putting forth scenarios that provide positive results, and not providing a thorough disclosure of potential risks and opportunities to their business strategies.

Early in 2021, there were many organizations that made net-zero commitments.  While these announcements were initially well-received, the investor community quickly realized that for some, there was little substance behind the targets.  The report collected investor’s sentiments to issuer target-setting and noted that they are most interested in seeing interim targets and an articulation of how the organization plans to get there.

The study outlines those investors themselves were surprised by the accelerating pace of change in ESG regulations and at the rate at which investors and corporates are progressing on this topic.   A well-articulated climate strategy is becoming a necessity for any issuer, and investors alike.

While having been driven by Europe until recently, North America is about to undergo seismic shifts as the new US administration begins to focus its regulatory and legislative agenda towards climate change. As much as the markets are already feeling pressures, several new regulatory initiatives are expected to be announced to drive the markets forward.

As the world, and its regulatory and its financial systems prepare for COP26, one thing is certain. Further changes are expected, and the stakes are increasing with each passing day for issuers, and investors alike.

*Millani’s Semi-Annual Study was published in two distinctive reports which can be read in conjunction with one another and can be found on our website

  • TCFD Disclosure Study: A Canadian Perspective
  • Semi-Annual Sentiment Study of Canadian Institutional Investors: Climate Change & TCFD-Aligned Reporting

Milla Craig is the founder and president of Millani.

Leave a Comment

America’s net zero opportunity

America’s net zero opportunity

Research from Princeton University plots a Blueprint for how the US can achieve net zero emissions in the next decade showing the key is overcoming execution challenges including the infrastructure deployment and the mobilisation of capital and labour.

Sort content by

Portfolio alignment: How it influences decision making

This session looked at the unintended consequences of the portfolio alignment metric, and how investors can incorporate forward-looking views into their analysis and how it affects investment decisions.

Scenario analysis and investment strategy – the risks of climate

Scenario analysis shows that the ability of pension funds to pay their pensions will be severely impacted by climate.

Impact investing at a total portfolio level

This conversation explored how global institutional investors are approaching the challenge of balancing financial and impact goals.

SEC chair Gensler in favour of mandatory climate disclosure

SEC chair Gary Gensler is in favour of the regulator stepping in to bring greater clarity and consistency to corporate climate disclosure. Speaking at a PRI webinar he said the current level of disclosure doesn’t allow investors to compare corporate climate preparedness, and that much of the data is inconsistent. 

Finding alpha: Church Commissioners outperform

The £9.2 billion portfolio managed for the Church Commissioners for England has returned 9.7 per cent over 10 years through a focus on sustainability and a willingness to try things early, such as forestry and venture capital. Amanda White spoke to CIO Tom Joy about where the fund looks for alpha and the need for a non-traditional allocation.

Asset owners apply pressure on managers for net zero integration

The David Rockefeller Fund and Wespath Institutional Investors explain how they are engaging managers, and holding them to account, in the drive to net zero integration.

Previous