Transparency, predictability underpin impact investing at Norges Bank

Predictability and transparency are fundamental to having impact as a global responsible investor, according to Wilhelm Mohn, the global head of governance at Norges Bank Investment Management, which manages Norway’s $1.43 trillion Government Pension Fund Global.

Owning around 1.4 per cent of the world’s equities and managing 95 per cent of them in-house, Norges took top spot in this year’s Global Pension Transparency Benchmark.

“Being predictable and transparent is, in itself, something that can make us more effective, make us have a bigger impact,” said Mohn, speaking at the Sustainability in Practice conference, organised by top1000funds.com and held this year at the University of Oxford.

Norges has a straightforward governance framework, Mohn said, with 70 per cent listed equities, 25 per cent listed bonds of which 70 per cent are government bonds, along with some unlisted real estate and unlisted renewable infrastructure investments.

In its corporate governance efforts to engage with companies, Norges has stewardship experts or subject matter experts on sustainability that take views on companies’ exposure to governance and sustainability risks and develop strategies to engage for change.

Its benchmark is determined by a department in the Norwegian Ministry of Finance, and its main strategic decisions are anchored in parliament, giving a lot of transparency to its operations. Norges publishes five days in advance how it is going to vote in board resolutions, with detailed explanations of its reasons if it decides to oppose a resolution.

Sponsored Content

This policy is based on three tenets carried since the beginning, Mohn said. “We should be principled in our approach that we build on clear principles and standards; We should be quite predictable so that it’s possible for our stakeholders and the company that you invest in to understand where they’re coming from and what we might do next; And then that that has to be underpinned by transparency.”

When the fund implements changes to its guidelines in a specific market, such as previously changing how it votes in Japan on independence or diversity, the fund tries “to be ahead of it to start conversations at market level,” Mohn said.

Norges has divested from 74 companies in 2022 and more than 440 since 2012, clearly viewing divestment as an effective tool while other asset owners are increasingly reluctant to use divestment as a tool, noted session chair Amanda White, director of international at Conexus Financial, publisher of Top1000funds.com. What is the thinking behind this?

Mohn said the engagement versus divestment discussion “is a little bit too binary at times,” and there are times when the fund decides “the risks are too high, and they’re not managed particularly well, and it’s not for us.”

The fund also has ethical exclusions about products or conduct it doesn’t want to invest in. Net zero is a central topic, along with anti-corruption, tax and transparency, human rights, human capital management, responsible AI, and water. 

Developing better analytics is a key pillar of being a responsible investor, Mohn said, by sharing coherently the results of its stewardship over time. 

“That’s essentially all a big accountability exercise and for us that’s really important,” Mohn said. “Because really what we’re trying to do by being a responsible investor is to safeguard these assets for the future. And it’s more important than anything that our ability to invest and to invest smartly and not to react with knee jerk reactions to anything, it’s the stability of all that that really decides whether we are a good investor for future generations.”

Leave a Comment

Meeting multiple objectives: The pension fund addressing mental health

Meeting multiple objectives: The pension fund addressing mental health

With the right governance models pension funds can play a role in broader societal issues, such as mental health in the workplace, while still delivering financial security for members. A unique “democratic governance structure” at the Danish Velliv Association allows it to manage multiple objectives, chief executive Lars Wallberg said.

Sort content by

Net zero targets drift out of reach but dynamic change is still possible

Net zero emission targets may cover most of the global economy, but the world is not going to deliver on its net zero promises, warned Oxford University’s Cameron Hepburn, speaking at Sustainability in Practice.

Abundant opportunities in dynamic, decentralised energy generation

The world is shifting from having very few centralised power stations feeding electricity into the grid, to a more dynamic market with abundant opportunities for investors, according to Alex Brierley, co-head, Octopus Energy Generation.

How to rewrite Modern Portfolio Theory to integrate climate risk

When it comes to climate risk, traditional scenario analysis leaves investors with more questions than answers and omits uncertainty around physical risk and the interaction between physical risk, inflation and tipping points. Investors need to abandon modern portfolio theory and find a new approach that focuses on short-term scenarios.

Impact investors, be wary of labeled bonds

Clarity around capital allocation and defined investment frameworks have made labeled bonds a lucrative opportunity for many impact investors. However, Oyin Oduya, impact measurement and management practice leader at the $1 trillion Wellington Management said the reality is not that straightforward.

Why ESG-momentum strategies with a focus on governance bring best returns

ESG-momentum matters when it comes to outperformance according to new research by Pictet Asset Management's head of sustainability Eric Borremans who says investors should sharpen their ESG lens and use active ownership to trigger positive change.

CPP shares the playbook for pushing corporates on scope 1, 2 emissions

A quarter of companies in CPP Investments' public equity allocation still don’t report Scope 1 and 2 emissions - one of the most fundamental indicators of whether a corporate board is engaging on the climate emergency.