Santiago Principles need update: panel

The conflicting modern-day purposes of sovereign wealth funds – to grow capital by investing globally and to be a stabilising force for their domestic economies – make it necessary to revise the Santiago Principles, argues Udaibir Das, division chief, monetary and capital markets department, at the International Monetary Fund.

“When they were written 10 years ago, it was only from the lens of the global mandate of SWFs,” Das said. “But look what’s happened since then, several members of the IFSWF have been challenged; the stabilisation function has overtaken investing abroad. It’s a tension that everyone in the room has felt, you can liquidate investments abroad that could have the impact on the international financial system but at the same time domestic situations need to be addressed.”

Speaking at the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds conference in Morocco, on a panel reflecting on 10 years of the Santiago Principles, Das also said that when the principles were formed, there was no massive policy focus on financial integrity, governance corruption, accountability and geopolitical risk, as there is today.

“The issue for me now is it’s not about returns only, it’s safety, security and the surety and sustainability of the money given to the SWFs to trust and keep intergernerationally,” he said.

Das suggested a forward agenda for the SWFs, in what he called the Marrakesh 7.He urged the following:

  • Bond – remain together, get closer, communicate
  • Review – the Santiago Principles, a forward-looking vision statement for the IFSFW, Santiago Principles version 2
  • Value – seek it first for the members, but members and for others
  • Co-operation – co-operative completion, co-investing, technical co-operation, in-house capability, analytics
  • Global – regulations and international discussion
  • Local – remember you are part of the domestic sovereign balance sheet and macro-fiscal framework
  • Trust – engender trust and confidence, explain, disclose, bring about reform.

The panel, chaired by Edwin Truman from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, also recognised that the Santiago Principles had moved the dial on transparency and accountability for sovereign wealth funds.

Sponsored Content

Mohmoud AA Mahmoud, director of the legal and compliance department, Kuwait Investment Authority, who said thanks to the Santiago Principles there were two draft bills in Kuwaiti Parliament in favour of more transparency.

“We have to prove we are not doing something wrong, show the world we do invest for specific purposes and reasons,” he said.[vc_images_carousel images=”25432,25435,25444,25443,25442,25441,25440,25439,25438,25437,25436″ img_size=”full”]

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Good for Harvard, good for the world: Why HMC embraced ESG with a passion

Harvard Management Corporation (HMC) signed up to the UN-supported Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) less than a year ago, but the company that manages the $36 billion Harvard University endowment is already moving rapidly to build environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors into every investment decision it makes. Jane Mendillo, president and chief executive of

G20 urged to develop policies to support long-term investment

The Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University has identified several of the key barriers to pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds adopting more effective long-term and sustainable investment strategies, and is preparing a communiqué to the upcoming meeting of the G20 to convey its concerns and its policy requirements. FIS, organised and hosted

Fiduciary investor think tank – delegate profile

Three finance professors from Stanford University presented their latest papers on active management, private equity and financial regulation, which were debated and work-shopped by US institutional investors in a one-day investment think tank. Chief investment officers from US public and corporate pension funds, endowments and foundations convened at Menlo Park, the home of Stanford University,

Images from fiduciary investor think tank

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Negative real interest rates a clear sign of financial repression

Sylvester Eijffinger, a Tilburg University professor and renowned international monetary policy expert said “financial repression is everywhere in the OECD” in a keynote address to the Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Amsterdam. Eijffinger says “the globalisation of monetary policy makes it very hard for emerging economies to shield themselves from these influences”. Eijffinger points to negative

No sustainability in European equation

Asset owners seeking comfort regarding Europe’s growth prospects had their hopes dashed by an expert panel speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Amsterdam. Recovery in Europe, and with it implications for the stability of global market forces, the investment allocations of investors and the political and social well being of EU residents, is still