Santiago Principles need update: panel

The conflicting modern-day purposes of sovereign wealth funds – to grow capital by investing globally and to be a stabilising force for their domestic economies – make it necessary to revise the Santiago Principles, argues Udaibir Das, division chief, monetary and capital markets department, at the International Monetary Fund.

“When they were written 10 years ago, it was only from the lens of the global mandate of SWFs,” Das said. “But look what’s happened since then, several members of the IFSWF have been challenged; the stabilisation function has overtaken investing abroad. It’s a tension that everyone in the room has felt, you can liquidate investments abroad that could have the impact on the international financial system but at the same time domestic situations need to be addressed.”

Speaking at the International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds conference in Morocco, on a panel reflecting on 10 years of the Santiago Principles, Das also said that when the principles were formed, there was no massive policy focus on financial integrity, governance corruption, accountability and geopolitical risk, as there is today.

“The issue for me now is it’s not about returns only, it’s safety, security and the surety and sustainability of the money given to the SWFs to trust and keep intergernerationally,” he said.

Das suggested a forward agenda for the SWFs, in what he called the Marrakesh 7.He urged the following:

  • Bond – remain together, get closer, communicate
  • Review – the Santiago Principles, a forward-looking vision statement for the IFSFW, Santiago Principles version 2
  • Value – seek it first for the members, but members and for others
  • Co-operation – co-operative completion, co-investing, technical co-operation, in-house capability, analytics
  • Global – regulations and international discussion
  • Local – remember you are part of the domestic sovereign balance sheet and macro-fiscal framework
  • Trust – engender trust and confidence, explain, disclose, bring about reform.

The panel, chaired by Edwin Truman from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, also recognised that the Santiago Principles had moved the dial on transparency and accountability for sovereign wealth funds.

Sponsored Content

Mohmoud AA Mahmoud, director of the legal and compliance department, Kuwait Investment Authority, who said thanks to the Santiago Principles there were two draft bills in Kuwaiti Parliament in favour of more transparency.

“We have to prove we are not doing something wrong, show the world we do invest for specific purposes and reasons,” he said.[vc_images_carousel images=”25432,25435,25444,25443,25442,25441,25440,25439,25438,25437,25436″ img_size=”full”]

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Fiduciary investor think tank London – delegate profile

Return to event coverage DELEGATES Jonathan Anayi, director, investment solutions, Winton Capital Ciarán Barr, investment director, RPMI Railpen Keith Carne, first bursar, Kings College, Cambridge Sarah Carter, executive director, Newton Centre for Endowment Asset Management, Cambridge University Nick Cavalla, chief investment officer, Cambridge University David Chambers, director of the Centre for Endowment Asset Management at

Concerns over private equity leave pension funds wary

Institutional investors are clearly attracted to private equity, but remain wary of the sector for its perceived lack of transparency and ability to be measured, high fees and a sense that they cannot invest into the sector as truly equal partners. “It’s clear that now is a time with a lot of flux in private

All aboard the change express as Railpen leaves the station

At the end of a corporate review process that lasted eight months, involved 23 meetings of a steering committee and produced 60 working papers, the UK railways pension fund Railpen was left with 422 action items. “We’ve done 224 of them,” Chris Hitchen, Railpen chief executive, told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University.

Using a ‘foreign language shield’ to improve investment decision making

Introducing a “foreign language shield” into a decision-making process is a proven way of making better decisions, according to Cass Sunstein, the Robert Walmsey University Professor at Harvard Law School. Sunstein, a former administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University that

ESG factors take centre stage in the evolving world of the fiduciary

The modern responsibilities of the fiduciary investor extend beyond what are perceived as the “mainstream” investment issues to those related to environment, society and governance (ESG) factors. But there is a growing understanding among fiduciaries that ESG considerations are now equally important in discharging their obligations. David Wood, adjunct lecturer in public policy and director of the Initiative for Responsible

The biggest risk for investors is misunderstanding uncertainty

As the focus of retirees shifts ever-further towards objectives-based outcomes, those entrusted with achieving those objectives will have to rethink a traditional approach to managing money involving risk and return trade-offs. Speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University, Abdallah Nauphal, chief executive and chief investment officer of Insight Investment, a BNY Mellon

Previous