Debunking common myths about European distressed debt

 

Monday 21 May
9:00 – 11:30 am
The Codrington Room, Corinthia Hotel London
Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2BD
United Kingdom 

 

Over the next several years, it is estimated that European banks need to dispose of approximately €2.5 trillion of non-core assets. The €800 billion “firewall” against sovereign debt default in Europe and long-term refinancing operations (LTRO) have eased liquidity stress among the region’s banks, but has not dealt with their solvency issues.

Like US banks, European lenders bought plenty of lower quality, higher yielding debt between 2003 and 2008 to support leveraged buy-outs, real estate deals and structured financial products. They are now under significant pressure to sell these, and other, assets as a result of upcoming Basel III regulation, the need to reduce reliance on wholesale funding and requirements from the EU and local governments. For the first time, Europe is experiencing a distressed debt cycle of vast proportions.

This presents a compelling opportunity for investors. However some widely believed myths are preventing private capital from investing in European corporate distressed debt.

Banks are unwilling to sell assets at distressed prices due to weak balance sheets

Sponsored Content

The truth is that a number of European banks are selling distressed assets, but this is not necessarily visible because divestitures are generally less public for a number of reasons. The roundtable will discuss the reality behind this myth, what skills and experience are required to access these sales processes and the size of the actionable distressed debt opportunity.

European insolvency laws make it next to impossible to achieve debt-for-equity swaps

European insolvency laws are varied and complex. Knowledgeable investors carefully select the jurisdictions they work in and know what can and cannot be achieved. The roundtable will compare and contrast legislation in different countries to highlight the most attractive areas and how laws in more difficult countries are evolving.

Unions, laws and culture prevent effective operational restructurings of European companies

Restructurings in Europe are fundamentally different than in the US. European labour laws, unions and culture are important and powerful considerations. We will discuss how it is possible to work constructively with local officials and unions to develop realistic plans which can ensure a company’s long-term viability and maximize employees’ welfare over time while agreeing to appropriate short-term sacrifices.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER YOUR INTEREST

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

Why diversity is important: Calif. funds

CalPERS and CalSTRS recently hosted over 400 attendees from academia, business, and investment to explore the connection between diversity, human capital and performance. And gave participants tangible next steps on how to increase diversity within their workplace and fresh momentum to push the diversity cause.

Understanding US/China relations

Understanding the fractious relationship between US and China is more important– and simultaneously more confronting – than it has been in the past, according to Stephen Kotkin, professor of history and international affairs at Princeton University. While the China investment challenge has always been to capture the aspirational middleclass, the high-profile historian says “the big money that’s going to be made in China is going to be made from the dislocation”.

The future of engagement

Ben Caldecott from The Oxford Sustainable Finance Programme at the University of Oxford explains how emerging technologies, changing client preferences, new regulatory landscapes, and evolving economic geographies create new opportunities for more effective engagement and forms of active ownership.

Investors debate engagement priorities

Should investors collectively prioritise engagement issues, and if so what is at the top of the list? This was one of the topics delegates discussed at the 8th Sustainable Finance Forum run by the Oxford University Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment together with The Rothschild Foundation and the KR Foundation.

What can the past teach us?

Institutional investors' investment strategy should be serving the China middle class and the dislocation from within Asia, according to Stephen Kotkin,Professor of History and International Affairs at Princeton University speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Cambridge University. He explored what the geopolitical conflicts of the past can teach us about the future. He looked at some of the key points in history, how China, the European Union and the US have survived, and what it means for the future.

NY State Common’s climate plan

The New York State Common Decarbonization Advisory Panel, set up to advise the Comptroller, as trustee of the $209.1 billion New York State Common Retirement Fund, on how best to mitigate investment risks stemming from climate change and maximise opportunities from the new, low-carbon economy, has handed down its report this week. It has clear lessons for all asset owners.

Previous