The hour for leadership is now

Business despair concept as a stranded businessman lost at sea standing on an isolated rock as a corporate idea for financial crisis or being lost and needing career or financial help to escape in a 3D illustration style.

Now more than ever, investment leaders have the opportunity to make life-changing differences for roughly four billion people’s savings and investments. They will do so by drawing from the widest range of leadership skills to manoeuvre through the epic challenges this crisis presents and by emerging with stronger, fairer and more sustainable businesses.

Research from management science identifies dominance and serving as the two critical pathways for leadership. There is a dominant, confident and support-demanded approach, and there is a serving, empathetic, and support-volunteered approach.

In times of uncertainty and stress, the confidence you can get from dominant leadership styles is favoured because it can mobilise the organisation to high-velocity action and compensate employees for their feeling of loss of control (think of how China dealt with the coronavirus).

But the management thinking is clear that this leadership choice is not a case of either / or but and. Essentially, both should be used and the exact mix should be reflective of circumstances.

One unique aspect of the coronavirus crisis is how personally challenging this is for the workforce. In Maslow’s hierarchy of needs it is basic safety that everyone craves right now. This suggests that the empathy shown to workers through this period of vulnerability will be preciously valued. For example, in the choice of what’s right to do now when family issues arise while working from home; this is the time to choose to do the family thing. For the best organisations, it’s not even close.

This crisis will probably turn out to be the biggest challenge faced by current leaders in their lifetimes. Previous experience suggests this leadership defining moment will be brilliantly handled by a few organisations, adequately handled by the vast majority, and probably botched by the remaining few. Which organisations will get into each group? This triage will take some time to be memorialized; but we know it will be through memorable stories of leaders with a human touch.

Sponsored Content

I would wager that many of the best stories will come from organisations where leadership and culture are strongest. They will have a few things in common: a balance in the craft of exercising dominant and serving leadership styles; a purposeful culture as a north star; clarity that profit play a supporting role in that purpose; and a culture that accommodates this ‘it’s all about the people’ moment.

With all this present disruption it’s hard to start work on an exit strategy, but good leaders should. The present crisis quickens the pace of three disruptive workplace realities which should be front-run.

First, there is growing complexity in organisational settings. This makes command and control-style leadership actually lose control because it cannot get enough accurate real-time information from the frontline. By contrast, good leaders always manage to stay in touch.

Second, there is a growing need for emotional intelligence among investment leadership. Employees increasingly expect work and life to be integrated and this is central to good employee experiences where well-being, purpose and personal growth rank highly and intrinsic motivations are more lasting than extrinsic forms like pay.

Third, there needs to be a culture of openness in the workplace. Leaders previously hoarded information. Now the open-cultured organisations can create the positive state of psychological safety at all levels with everyone feeling included. This plays to better decision making all round and helps people with their resilience during tough times.

These disruptions most importantly require leaders to be T-shaped. Most industry leaders will be deep experts in their field – this constitutes the vertical bar of the ‘T’. But many will not have the horizontal bar of the ‘T’ which only comes with having situational fluency around wider societal and business issues and is achieved through being in-touch with a wider network and other disciplines.

This being more in-touch means for example: a greater understanding of stress and fight or flight responses in brain science; the balancing of dominant and serving leadership in management science; the critical quality of safe space in psychology; and how to apply the delicate art of being human.

An additional, and highly relevant, T-shaped skill is the understanding of systems-theory. This is about how pandemic systems affect our lives and health; how systems may brutalise our planet; and also, if we get it right how the financial system can lay the foundations for wealth and well-being to be more fairly distributed.

The investment challenge of tomorrow is to build sustainable organisations that harness people and technology to create value in a wholly integrated sustainable investment system. We should resume our sustainable investing quest after the crisis abates with considerably more zeal than before.

Investment leadership needs to step up. It needs to project confidence that it can crack through this crisis. It then needs to re-group with the benefits of extraordinary lessons learned through extraordinary times and morph into something better. While this crisis is rightly producing stories of heroes in scrubs and gowns, the investment industry will be discovering its own heroes. They are likely to be T-shaped leaders: both sure-footed in strategy and steeped in humanity.

Roger Urwin is the co-founder of the Thinking Ahead Institute and head of global content at Willis Towers Watson.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Long Covid for the global economy

Long Covid for the global economy

Prevention is the balm for global economic shock, says respected central bank adviser Professor Warwick McKibbin who says the world’s economic future is uncertain and inflation is likely to remain under a persistent pandemic.

Sort content by

A mindset for the future

Angela Rodell, CEO of the Alaska SWF, looks into a post-COVID future and what investors, such as APFC, with an investment horizon of five years or longer, should be considering.

What past market crashes teach us

Looking back at the portfolios of large institutional investors during and after the dot.com crash and the GFC, CEM Benchmarking, reveals commonality in the portfolios that thrived. For both events the top quartile returns were more than 2 per cent higher than the bottom quartile. Analysing the asset allocation and behaviour of investors showed two clear themes: top quartile performers had more defensive allocations pre-crash; and rebalancing is a tailwind for performance.

COVID-19 highlights human rights

The financial system will play a critical role in enabling economic recovery, development and contributing to wider societal well-being, including a focus on human rights. The PRI is working with investors to ensure that the financial sector contributes to, not detracts from, more inclusive societies. A world post COVID-19 needs to ensure the recovery respects both the boundaries of the planet and the rights of its people.

Markets remain fragile

A risk management strategy that measures resilience and fragility of markets, protected portfolios from the wild February downswing in equity markets, and predicts more fragility to come.

Investing in infra: living dangerously?

COVID-19 lockdowns have highlighted the risks in infrastructure, that have been there all along. The realisation that infrastructure assets represent significant risk exposures, that should be understood and managed, will determine the coming of age of the infrastructure asset class.

Markets as amplifiers of crises

Financial markets played a central role in creating the problems that ultimately inflicted significant damage on the wider economy - in the dot.com bubble, sub-prime mortgage crisis and the eurozone debt crisis. But what about the unhelpful role that the finance sector can play in amplifying crises that emerge from entirely non-financial origins?

Previous