University of California: Equity boost, and fossil fuels back on the table

University of California’s chief investment officer Jagdeep Singh Bachher said its office of investment is considering increasing its allocation to equities by 3.5 per cent. The extra allocation will be drawn from winding down the absolute return portfolio.

“The absolute return category in our asset allocation is down to zero. I propose moving 100 per cent [of that allocation] into public equity,” said Bachher, speaking during the endowment’s March investment committee meeting in its first gathering of the year.

Rather than increase the allocation to bonds or private markets, Bachher called for bold and decisive strategies in public markets where opportunities include AI, life sciences, defence and an array of tech growth industries that are poised to transform the businesses operate.

“The tech decade just getting started,” he said.

Bachher said that international equity ex-US will offer some of the most compelling opportunities because of the sudden shift in government policies and dislocations caused by recent geopolitics.

“Countries around the world have woken up,” he said, citing Europe as an example because Germany has just embarked on an economic stimulus that will unleash defence spending and overhaul German infrastructure.

Sponsored Content

“[We are seeing] the kind of spending in some parts of Europe we have not seen in decades [as] Europeans come together and stimulate the economy,” he said.

Still, despite his enthusiasm for opportunities outside the US, the board heard that the rest of the world is more likely to feel the pain of US trade policy than the US economy. He also said the record-breaking returns in equity over recent years are unlikely to be repeated in the “next five years.”

The public equity team are also exploring regional diversification in emerging markets like India, hunting for opportunities in sectors including power and utilities. However, he warned against stock picking strategies. “It’s very tough picking individual stocks.”

The portfolio has around 60 per cent in stocks (11 per cent in bonds and the rest in private assets), and Bachher said public equities typically return between 6-8 per cent. At their height in the last nine months, they have returned as much as 13 per cent.

Reconsidering fossil fuels?

Baccher didn’t rule out re-entering fossil fuels either. Re-investing in oil and gas would mark a break with strategy since the university excluded fossil fuels in 2020 when it completed the sale of more than $1 billion in assets from its pension, endowment and working capital pools.

“So far, being ex-fossil fuels is ok. But there is no policy of ours that [says] we shall never invest in oil and gas. [I am] putting that on the table as it’s a consideration I entertain as I think about oil and gas.”

However, some markets remain a no-go. The University of California is still negative on China, having reduced its allocation to the country three years ago. Bachher said he has no plans to increase the allocation to China outside the investor’s MSCI ACWI exposure because of uncertainties around tripping executive orders.

“I don’t know if I am going to be investing in something or have ties to something [that] in essence violates an executive order of the US government,” he said. Citing the compliance risk of inadvertently violating a rule that “he is not aware of,” he said China has become uninvestable for American investors, despite opportunities like electric car manufacturer BYD and AI company DeepSeek. The risk means the university has ruled out the idea of picking China-based managers and investing outside the index:  he also flagged challenges that venture capital firms invested in the region are having in exiting holdings in China.

Bachher said investors now face two separate investment worlds: China and America. University of California is playing the American world but he said “a wild card policy” could change that if the US and China agreed to a trade deal.

The two powerful countries have agreed to temporarily lower tariffs imposed on each other’s products for 90 days after negotiations that took place in Geneva, as talks towards a longer-term trade arrangement continue.

“If you asked me what could be a wild card in all of these policies – [if] President 47 and the Chinese leadership decided to do a trade deal [it would provide] a huge boost to China and the US in a wild card.”

Managing liquidity is the number one concern

Bachher said managing liquidity and ensuring he has enough capital on hand in the current uncertain environment for US universities is his number one concern. Under the Trump administration, US university endowments face higher taxes and threats to cut research funding. It’s triggered a renewed focus on the simplest forms of capital endowments manage.

California Regents has a working capital pool of around $11 billion divided between a short-term investment pool (STIP) of around $2 billion and a total return investment pool (TRIP) of around $9.4 billion.

“If you feel like you want to shore up operating liquidity, take the unrealised gain in your TRIP pool and put in your STRIP pool,” he said.

Bachher also urged Wall Street firms that benefit from investing money on behalf of universities, endowments and public pension funds, to do more to support academic institutions under fire from the current administration.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

Optimal long-term allocation with pension fund liabilities

The literature on how to optimally manage the investments of defined contribution funds is relatively scarce, despite the fact the growth in defined contribution continues to outpace defined benefit funds globally. Now new research from academics at the University of Lausanne demonstrates how to perform an ALM study from a financial prospective for defined contribution

Japan’s GPIF allocates to smart beta

The $1.3 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan will use factor investing, or smart beta, as a third way of implementing equity mandates, alongside active and passive, following a six-month research project conducted by MSCI that investigated how to best implement the growing interest in factor exposures.   The research project conducted by MSCI

What’s the impact of the stock:bond correlation?

The correlation between stocks and bonds in a rising interest rate environment can turn positive. So given the likelihood of a rate rise, what should asset allocation look like if investors are forward looking?   One of the growing trends in asset and risk allocations is to adopt a forward-looking view driven by macroeconomics, rather

CalPERS grapples with new allocation targets

Implementing the asset allocation changes of a very large portfolio, particularly in private markets, is a conundrum CalPERS is dealing with as it moves its asset allocation and decides how to fill new private market allocations.   In February this year the $283 billion CalPERS investment committee approved a new strategic asset allocation which will

US funds need paradigm asset allocation shift

US public pension funds are ignoring their liabilities in managing their pension assets, a situation that needs a paradigm shift in thinking and asset allocation to ensure benefits can be paid to beneficiaries. The dialogue about the US public pension funds’ underfunding position continued at the CFA Institute’s annual conference this week, with Ronald Ryan

Risks are multi-faceted and evolving: Litterman

If Robert Litterman were a CIO of a public pension plan he would not try to hit an “unrealistic return target”. Amanda White speaks to him about risk, quants, asset allocation and climate change. There is a serious problem with US public pension funds and the “unrealistic commitments and unrealistic return targets” they have set,

Previous