Washington State prioritises excellence

The $70.5 billion Washington State Investment Board has prioritised hiring the best managers in public equities and is willing to sacrifice the number of active investment relationships in lieu of the managers it believes are “truly exceptional” as it enters 2010 with plans for global manager searches.

As part of its 2010 public equities strategy, the fund will focus on the less efficient global and emerging markets allotting broad mandates and migrate towards a broader, more flexible, more focused, global structure.

Chief investment officer, Gary Bruebaker, said the search for global managers would focus on finding the best managers, those with which the fund has “high conviction”.

The WSIB has a target allocation of 37 per cent to equities, split between international (22 per cent) and US equities (15 per cent) and hires a total of 13 managers.

Within international equities 20 per cent is allocated to emerging markets, where all of the assets are managed actively in five mandates, and 80 per cent to developed markets, split 80:20 to active managed by a total of nine managers.

In a presentation to the board senior investment officer, public equity, Philip Paroian, said passive management should be the default investment strategy in cases when staff cannot identify exceptional managers.

Sponsored Content

One of the board’s trustees, David Nierenberg who sits on the WSIB’s private markets and public markets committees and is president of Nierenberg Investment Management Company, stressed the importance of having adequate resources to find the best active managers and oversee those managers.

“If we do not have the resources to do this, then we must fall back to more indexing and selection and oversight of fewer active managers,” he said.

Bruebaker said the board has set clear direction that they are not interested in managing active US equities, and he said staff should not bring forth any active purely US focused products.

About 75 per cent of the US equities allocation is passive, with a 25 per cent enhanced indexed allocation.

The WSIB public equities managers are Capital, JP Morgan, Lazard, GMO, Arrowstreet, Pyramis, Artio, William Blair, LSV, Mondrian, Barclays, SSgA, and BGI.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington reviews governance, pay and in-house investment

The pay levels, amount of in-house investment activity and governance structure of the $83 billion Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) may be under review following a rigorous debate that included a presentation to the board by KPA Advisory’s Keith Ambachtsheer.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

PRI calls for academics to fill ESG research gaps

Responsible investment research has reached a “tipping point” in its development, says the PRI’s director of strategic development, Rob Lake, and it needs to be more closely aligned to the practical needs of front-line investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Top1000funds.com brings some of the world’s largest investors together in Beijing

More than 70 investors representing more than $3.1 trillion in pension, endowment and sovereign fund capital will converge on Beijing on Sunday for the first Top1000funds Fiduciary Investors Symposium.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

HOOPP splits investment functions as Keohane appointed to top job

The $35.7 billion Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) will split its chief investment officer function in two following the appointment of Jim Keohane to president and chief executive and the retirement of John Crocker.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

No rewards as systemic risk and turbulence ratings soar

The market is reflecting a high state of systemic risk and turbulence, and investors should adjust their allocation to growth assets accordingly, says Lucas Turton, chief investment strategist of Windham Capital Management.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why institutions trade their reputations for profit

It is a key assumption that financial institutions such as auditing firms and credit ratings agencies will act in an ethical way to protect their reputation because it is, ultimately, the source of their profitability. But groundbreaking work by Harvard University postdoctoral fellow Abigail Brown posits that institutions may actually be incentivised to cyclically “trade

Previous