Top 20 managers lift share of global market

The largest 20 funds managers in the world lifted their combined market share last year as the industry recovered from two years of funds under management outflows.

According to the annual survey of the largest 500 managers in the world by TowersWatson and Pensions & Investments magazine, total FUM increased 16.1 per cent to $62 trillion as at December 2009, after a fall of nearly 20 per cent in 2008.

The largest 20 managers continued to grow faster than the rest of the pack, increasing their share of the top 500’s assets from 38.3 per cent to 40.2 per cent. Over the past 10 years, the average growth rate of the top 20 was 7.2 per cent, compared with 5.7 per cent for the whole 500.

However, the top 20 also tend to be the most acquisitive, with the figures including many mergers and acquisitions in that time. Last year, BlackRock merged with Barclays Global Investors to form the largest funds management firm by a wide margin, with $3,346 billion in FUM. State Street Global Investors jumped over Allianz Group during the year to take second spot with $1,911 billion. There were 12 US-based managers in the top 20. Overall, North American managers had $30.6 trillion in FUM – almost half of the world’s assets held by the largest 500 firms. The ones in the top 20 managed 62.7 per cent of the assets in that group.

Apart from the continuation of the US domination of the marketplace, other trends included a sharp decline for Japanese managers, a further rise for managers in emerging markets and a rise for managers in Continental Europe versus the UK.

But the survey results mask the true picture in individual countries. In Australia, for instance, total FUM by the 15 managers in the top 500 has declined as a proportion of the universe. But in that market, a plethora of specialist and boutique managers have sprung up in the past 10 years. These managers have attracted the bulk of the institutional investment from Australia’s pension funds.

Sponsored Content

Bank-owned firms make up half of the world’s top 20, while three are owned by insurance companies and seven are independent.

Assets managed by passive managers shot ahead by 62 per cent last year, partly due to the BlackRock/BGI merger muddying the waters.

The top 20 managers as at December 31, 2009, were:

  1. BlackRock ($3,346b)
  2. State Street ($1,911b)
  3. Allianz Group ($1,859b)
  4. Fidelity Investments ($1,699b)
  5. Vanguard Group ($1,509b)
  6. AXA Group ($1,453b)
  7. BNP Paribas ($1,326b)
  8. Deutsche Bank ($1,261b)
  9. JP Morgan Chase ($1,252b)
  10. Capital Group ($1,179b)
  11. Bank of New York Mellon ($1,114b)
  12. Credit Agricole ($918b)
  13. UBS ($876b)
  14. Goldman Sachs ($871b)
  15. HSBC ($857b)
  16. Bank of America ($750b)
  17. Natixis ($724b)
  18. Legg Mason ($682b)
  19. Prudential, US ($667b)
  20. Northern Trust ($627b)

Download the PDF version here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous