SWFs return home after run of cross-border deals

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) piled a record $20 billion into foreign direct investment (FDI) transactions last year, continuing the big cross-border forays they began in 2005.



But FDI and cross-border M&A activity from SWFs collapsed at the beginning of 2009 as portfolios were hit by the market downturn, and funds received less revenue from home governments as global trade slowed and commodity prices declined.

The findings were published in the World Investment Report 2009 by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCAD).

The surge of FDI by SWFs “bucked the downward trend in global FDI as a whole” during 2008, the report states.

In the past two decades, cross-border M&A activity from SWFs totalled $65 billion, of which $57 billion was invested in the past four years.

Sponsored Content

Nearly three quarters of this FDI was directed to developed countries, particularly the UK, US and Canada.

The investments were highly concentrated in the financial and business services industries, respectively accounting for 26 per cent and 15 per cent of cross-border M&A between during 1987 to 2008.

The biggest investments were made by the SWFs of the United Arab Emirates and Singapore’s Temasek.

But in 2008, SWFs favoured mining, quarrying and petroleum industries, paring back their allocations to financial services, which nevertheless remains the most heavily invested sector.

But the stockmarket meltdowns of 2008 caused big investment losses and depressed the pace of growth of FDI and cross-border M&A activities. With economies looking at recovery but still hurting from the financial crisis, SWFs are putting more money in their home markets “to support their banking industries, to boost expenditures by their firms and, in some cases, to avoid foreign takeovers of some domestic firms,” the UNCAD report states.

“A number of them are withdrawing their investments in anticipation of further reductions in the value of their investments, and some of them are re-routing their funds for use in their domestic economies to restore investor confidence,” it says.

Meanwhile, the report calculated that four major SWFs form the Gulf together lost about $350 billion in 2008, falling from $1.165 trillion to $1.115 trillion.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority shed $183 billion from the $453 billion it held in 2007. But the emirate pumped $57 billion into the fund, pushing its value to $329 billion.

The Kuwait Investment Authority lost $94 billion from its $262 billion, but the government primed it with $59 billion, lifting its funds under management to $228 billion.

The Qatar Investment Authority recorded a loss of $27 billion to land at $66 billion, while the Saudi Arabia Monetary Agency saw $46 billion vanish from its $501 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous