Securities body ramps up risk surveillance

Securities watchdog, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), has revamped its structure to better identify market risks and develop regulatory standards for capital markets.

IOSCO has approved a new structure and funding so it can continue to “provide the lead in the development of regulatory standards for capital markets”, said Jane Diplock, chair of IOSCO’s executive committee.

The funding changes were to ensure that IOSCO had the resources to identify emerging securities markets risks and could respond to requests for targeted work by the G20 and the Financial Stability Board.

After last week’s IOSCO conference in Cape Town, Diplock said that securities markets did not “as many market participants once fondly believed” regulate themselves. “Regulation must play its part – regulation that aims at sustaining the financial system and preventing individuals and businesses from exploiting and weakening it, even bringing it to its knees.”

She said IOSCO was now recognised as the standard setter for securities markets regulation by the G20 and international financial institutions.

The decision to re-structure and re-fund ensured that IOSCO could meet those challenges.

Sponsored Content

Diplock said that the power of IOSCO’s Objectives and Principles for Securities Regulation were in the fact that they were internationally agreed and nationally applicable. “Unlike some other global multilateral efforts which have stalled,” she said, “IOSCO has made significant progress in global standard-setting.

“This is why the G20 has mandated full implementation of the IOSCO Principles in every G20 country and encouraged their use in all others.”

Diplock pointed to what she called IOSCO’s other success story: the development and implementation of a global protocol, the IOSCO MoU, for the exchange of information needed to police and sanction market misconduct.

Of the 122 member regulators, 80 now fully meet the MoU’s requirements and were “engaged in combating fraudulent market activity and its consequences for investors”, Diplock said.

Diplock, who is chair of the soon-to-be-disbanded New Zealand Securities Commission, will stand down this week after 10 years at the NZSC. The irony is that, during this position, she was nicknamed Plane Jane due to the amount of time she spent overseas as the executive chairman of IOSCO.

The New Zealand Shareholders’ Association said the country’s securities commission had failed.The association’s chairman, John Hawkins, described the regulator as a “late-arriving ambulance at the bottom of the cliff”.

Hawkins doubted that Diplock achieved the two main tasks of setting “boundaries of acceptable behaviour in the market” and enforcing the rules.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous