Norwegian SWF pushes equity exposure beyond 50pc amid Q1 losses

The $US 324 billion Government Pension Fund – Global (NBIM) of Norway pushed its allocation to equities beyond 50 per cent in the course of Q1 2009 at the expense of its fixed income portfolio, maintaining a strategic bent towards a higher exposure to growth assets.

In the northern summer of 2007, the fund decided to steadily build up its equity exposure from 40 to 60 per cent. At the end of Q1 2009, its allocation to equities stood at 52.6 per cent, which included an average holding of 0.86 per cent across global markets, and 1.58 per cent in European markets, according to the latest NBIM Quarterly report.

The fund returned minus 4.81 per cent for the first quarter of 2009. Relative to its benchmark portfolio, which is defined by the Norway’s Ministry of Finance, it produced an excess return of minus 0.35 per cent.

It attributed the weak results to its fixed income portfolio, which held bonds in the core and supplementary capital of financial institutions that were bought before the financial crisis broke out and became illiquid as it intensified. The portfolio produced a negative excess return of 0.92 per cent, while its equities book returned 0.30 per cent.

A stronger Norwegian krone also led to a loss of $US 27 billion during the quarter.

Sponsored Content

Portions of the NBIM’s equity and fixed income portfolios are outsourced to external managers. The proportion of externally-managed assets rose by $US 6.7 billion to $US 54.8 billion during the quarter.

One result of parcelling out this capital as mandates was a large increase in the cumulative fees paid to external managers, up from $US 11.7 million early last year to $US 65.1 million at the end of Q1 2009, including an increase in performance fees of $US 43.1 million.

The fund stated these fee payments reflected the accrual of costs only, and not the size of the fees paid. Meantime, many new mandates were awarded in 2008, and a number of its equity managers notched good numbers in Q1.

During this period, the volume of inflows into the fund was the lowest since 2004, at $US 6.9 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous