Norway SWF posts booming quarter

Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, the $456.4 billion (NOK 2,549 billion) Government Pension Fund – Global, returned 13.5 per cent for the quarter due to improved liquidity in fixed income instrument and climbing equity markets, as the fund continued diversification within emerging markets.

The strong performance brought in $29.2 billion for the fund, which was added to $8.8 billion in new inflows, and drove the fund’s year-to-date performance to 21.8 per cent.

With a 17.7 per cent return from its equities portfolio, and 7.2 per cent from its fixed income book, the fund beat its benchmark portfolio by 1.5 per cent for the quarter after adjusting for currency transactions.

But the fixed income portfolio delivered an excess return of 3.3 per cent, compared to the marginal outperformance of the equities investments, which contribute 0.2 per cent.

The outperformance of fixed income instruments was attributed to payoffs from illiquid positions taken by the fund before the financial crisis broke, including securitised debt and corporate bond investments. The excess returns from equities were sourced from internally managed portfolios, with a marginally negative contribution from external equity managers.

Sponsored Content

“In a quarter when equity markets rapidly advanced, the different strategies for our active equity management had dissimilar and non-systematic exposure to underlying market movements,” the fund stated.

Norges Bank Investment Management, the investment arm of the fund, has awarded 14 specialist mandates for external managers so far this year, eight of which target emerging markets. At the end of September, it was invested with locally based managers in China, India, Russia, Poland, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Brazil and South Africa.

Compared to the first nine months of 2008, the performance-based fees paid by the fund to external managers rose from $46.4 million to $221.8 million by the end of September. The vastly larger aggregate fee reflected better performance – which are not awarded on the basis of market movements but on outperformance over time, typically rolling 36-month periods – and the appointment of additional managers.

The fund’s equity portfolio rose 2 per cent to comprise 62 per cent of the fund’s assets during the quarter. At the end of September, the found owned, on average, 1 per cent of the world’s listed companies at the close of the third quarter.

It noted that absolute volatility at the end of September was “not significantly higher” than mid-2007, before the market collapse. It referred to a key financial risk indicator in the money market, the spread between US Treasury Bill yields and interbank lending rates, which “narrowed further in the third quarter to levels seen before the start of the financial turmoil in mid-2007″.

“The liquidity crisis therefore seems to be over,” the fund concluded.

Between January 1, 1998 and September 30, 2009, the fund produced an annual return of 4.5 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous