Minimising currency exposure

Ron Liesching, chairman of Mountain Pacific Group, an investment firm that contributed to the development of the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit, examines a new solution to managing currency risk.

Global investors struggle with one central issue, currency risk. Now there is a new solution: the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit (WPU). The WPU is a diversified basket consisting of 13 components that are designed to preserve global value.

Primarily a basket that includes the seven most liquid developed currencies and the four BRIC currencies, the FTSE WPU also has a small weight in two commodities – oil and gold.

Components of FTSE WPU

Source: FTSE, weights as of February 17, 2012

The dollar and beyond

Sponsored Content

Investors hold most of their assets in developed countries; the investments are attractive, but the currency exposure is not. For example, global developed market equities have 50 per cent exposure to the US dollar and another 31 per cent exposure to the euro, yen and pound sterling.

This undiversified currency basket is the side effect of equity investment. The currency basket is unattractive because these countries have unsustainable deficits and are at risk of credit downgrades. US, Euro and UK interest rates are well below inflation and no investor would recommend this currency basket.

The solution is to hedge the currency exposure into a superior diversified basket. Many have proposed this. At its 2011 annual conference, UBS surveyed over 80 managers of central banks, sovereign wealth funds and multilaterals with total assets over $8 trillion. Over half the respondents predicted that the dollar would be replaced by a currency basket within the next 25 years.

The World Bank’s Robert Zoellick went further in a November 2010 Financial Times article in which he proposed a new monetary system based on the major global currencies – including the dollar, euro, yen, pound and renminbi – that also makes use of gold.

 

Preserving long-term wealth
The volatility of FTSE WPU measured against the US dollar is currently 6 per cent per annum and the FTSE WPU yield is near 2 per cent per annum.

Hedging into FTSE WPU does not disturb existing investments. A separate currency-hedging program replaces the concentrated currency risk with FTSE WPU exposure. The WPU is designed to be liquid, so hedging $1 billion would have little market impact.

When revenues are in one currency, the FTSE WPU is especially useful as Ghazi Abdul Jawad, an advisory board member for FTSE WPU and chairman of Altaira Middle East noted: “A fall in the US dollar hits both oil revenues and the value of US assets. So partly hedging assets into FTSE WPU sharply reduces the US dollar risk that investors in this region face.”

Ultra high net worth groups and monetary authorities understand there is no riskless currency. They want to preserve long-term wealth in global terms. Philip Coggan, Buttonwood columnist at the Economist, notes in his new book, “Paper Promises”, that “The massive debts accumulated over the last 40 years can’t be repaid in full, and they won’t be paid”.

This is already happening: US inflation is currently 3 per cent per annum. As the Treasury Bill rate is 5 basis points, nearly 3 per cent per annum is being lost in real wealth. Inflation is the best way for democracies to deal with excessive debt. But this is doubly bad for foreign investors. Foreign investors lose from internal devaluation caused by inflation and external devaluation caused by declining currency value. This is why investors want to hedge their paper currency risk and preserve their wealth in global terms. The components in FTSE WPU are weighted to minimise these two paper currency risks. The movement of a currency against FTSE WPU shows how the global value of that currency is evolving. That rate is published daily by FTSE.

On December 31, 2011, one WPU bought US$1.

 

 

Asset Owner:World Bank

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous