Large hedge funds to dominate as banks, small funds withdraw

Large, diversified hedge funds with institutional-quality operations are more likely to survive their smaller rivals as the sector continues to contract, according to a research note by Morgan Stanley.

Larger, institutional-quality managers are expected to gain market share as smaller funds continue to shut-down – a process that appears to be accelerating, Morgan Stanley writes in a January 2009 Investment Focus note.

The larger managers are more likely to commit resources to compliance and operational infrastructure than their smaller rivals as regulation of financial markets continues to evolve.

New, increasingly demanding regulation will also limit the ability of smaller managers to exploit investment opportunities.

While larger managers can also build customised trading programs to adjust to changing regulation, smaller firms must often wait for off-the-shelf trading programs to be modified by vendors.

Sponsored Content

“Institutional-quality managers, who typically possess more sophisticated risk infrastructures, have the ability to pursue non-standard means to hedge exposures and, thus, can capitalise on the greater inefficiencies created by new regulatory restrictions,” Morgan Stanley states.

The surviving hedge funds will find themselves with fewer competitors as banks, under pressure to reduce leverage and, by extension, proprietary risk-taking operations, withdraw from markets in which they once competed with hedge funds.

“While the outlook on near-term returns for hedge funds remains unclear, we believe that opportunities are abundant for investors with a longer-term time horizon to take advantage of significant distortions in the market.”

Such opportunities exist in the convertible arbitrage, bank loan and investment-grade corporate bond markets, Morgan Stanley writes.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous